Online Now 2172

Off Topic Board

FightOn247 message board for off topic posts

On this Board 335
Record: 953 (11/5/2012)

Online now 2042
Record: 4850 (6/6/2012)

Boards ▾

Fighton247 Board

The home for discussion on USC athletics

Off Topic Board

FightOn247 message board for off topic posts

Trojan News on the Net

Latest USC headlines from around the net

Reply

Why do younger..........

  • phearsc said...

    Now I'll get 47 down votes from the 6 liberals and their 20 accounts and my rating will plunge again, as is always the case when I venture here to the OT forum. BTW when did this place become so F'ing liberal?

    It's certainlly not as conservative as the old "hangout" was.....or is now. I find the balance here is pretty good though.
    It's still a conservative leaning board IMHO.
    This site certainly got the left leaning posters when the split happened .but it got most of the posters, period.
    You need to venture to OT a bit more phear. Maybe it's a "mice will play when the cats away " type of thing?47 downvotes....That was funny. Good take as well on the issue at hand.
    Upvote for you.

    This post has been edited 4 times, most recently by icky trojan on 2/8/2012 at 4:22 AM

    signature image signature image signature image

    Feelings get hurt, best not to have any! DESTROY!

    icky trojan

  • I blame MTV

    signature image

    WhyNot90240

  • ca4usc said...

    Why do younger peeps lean to the left and as we grow older we start leanin to the right? not sure i've seen this talked about before, but i could be wrong.

    The most simple answer I can offer is that as people get older and acquire more stuff, they want to give less of that stuff to the government.

    On the social front.....my opinion is that as people get older, they almost always think of those younger than themselves as pushing social boundaries more aggressively than they did in the past, so they are resistant to the change that those younger people represent......and they find themselves more comfortable with those that consider themselves to be socially conservative.

    cstory80

  • bigtrojaned said...

    I worked for the registrar in SB county for 5 years. One county hit hard by the downturn. This county is a strong GOP county. Most poor people don't vote. I personally lean to the left and honestly I feel it is based on how u were raised. My parents grew up poor and earned what they have but I have never seen them lean to the right. I feel that has impacted my ways as well

    Yeah..my fathers side of the family was all working class ( Dad ws the only one who went to college..the rest worked or went into the army) and he was a registered democrat ( he actually was a driver at th 1960 LA conventions while he was at SC) ..but as he worked in defense..a field that without a doubt benefitted from GOP decisions/policies and became a professional he voted republican more times than not . I know he didn't like Bush after 1 term. I didn't either though..since 1992 when I could vote in a general elction I have never voted for a republican candidate ( almost went with McCain...went with Obama ) but I'm pretty confident that will change this fall ...

    My moms family was from the other side of the tracks ( upper middle class) all went to college ( my uncle dropped out and went to the Navy) they were what I'd call typical republicans and I doubt ever considered voting for a democrat.

    Most certainly how one was raised impacts their views.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Feelings get hurt, best not to have any! DESTROY!

    icky trojan

  • WhyNot? said...

    I blame MTV

    That was so stupid ..but when I think about it there is some..scratch that ...A whole lot of truth to it . Whoever MTV endorses or whatever views they find noble...the kids love !!
    I want my MTV !! Yeah VOTE OR DIE !!!
    upvote

    This post was edited by icky trojan on 2/8/2012 at 1:08 AM

    attachmentattachment
    signature image signature image signature image

    Feelings get hurt, best not to have any! DESTROY!

    icky trojan

  • cstory80 said...

    The most simple answer I can offer is that as people get older and acquire more stuff, they want to give less of that stuff to the government.

    On the social front.....my opinion is that as people get older, they almost always think of those younger than themselves as pushing social boundaries more aggressively than they did in the past, so they are resistant to the change that those younger people represent......and they find themselves more comfortable with those that consider themselves to be socially conservative.

    Sounds about right ..

    signature image signature image signature image

    Feelings get hurt, best not to have any! DESTROY!

    icky trojan

  • cstory80 said...

    The most simple answer I can offer is that as people get older and acquire more stuff, they want to give less of that stuff to the government.

    On the social front.....my opinion is that as people get older, they almost always think of those younger than themselves as pushing social boundaries more aggressively than they did in the past, so they are resistant to the change that those younger people represent......and they find themselves more comfortable with those that consider themselves to be socially conservative.

    Anecdotally for me and people I grew up with and am still friends with "protecting our stuff" does not really come into play anymore when were older than it did when we were younger. I'd argue that I'm more willing / likely to give my stuff away now than i did when I was young and poor, mainly because I can spare it now. 20 year olds don't want to give away their stuff either.

    Now as I've seen more and more waste and mismanagement of the stuff that I have given to the gov't over the years I've thought to myself giving the gov't more of my stuff is just sending good stuff after bad. That's a concept I didn't practically understand until after I got out of college. Throwing stuff at a problem is often not a good fix and just leads more waste and a lot more abuse of my stuff.

    I agree with C on the social front. I think as people age they get more emotionally attached to the social norms and mores that are prevelant throughout their lives.

    The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen - Dennis Prager

    TrojanMonkey

  • cstory80 said...

    The most simple answer I can offer is that as people get older and acquire more stuff, they want to give less of that stuff to the government.

    On the social front.....my opinion is that as people get older, they almost always think of those younger than themselves as pushing social boundaries more aggressively than they did in the past, so they are resistant to the change that those younger people represent......and they find themselves more comfortable with those that consider themselves to be socially conservative.

    Like I pointed out earlier -- conservatives are not as concerned with protecting what they have, as they want EVERYONE to be able to keep the fruits of their labor.

    It is not about being selfish, it is about rewarding hard work.

    deetj13

  • Rosebowl91 said...

    Higher educated people lean left....

    this couldnt be farther from the truth. But nice attempt at a blanket statement!

    For $20 you get Chachi, but $40 gets you Fonzie....

    Mickey Av

  • cstory80 said...

    The most simple answer I can offer is that as people get older and acquire more stuff, they want to give less of that stuff to the government.

    On the social front.....my opinion is that as people get older, they almost always think of those younger than themselves as pushing social boundaries more aggressively than they did in the past, so they are resistant to the change that those younger people represent......and they find themselves more comfortable with those that consider themselves to be socially conservative.

    this.

    My father was as left leaning as one could be for most of his life (peace corps instead of vietnam etc)...but as he has eased into retirement his views have changed. He has become more conservative of late (more fiscally than socially....but even his views on social issues has changed), and I think it has a lot to do with what cstory pointed out.

    Being in retirement, or another type of fixed income makes one focus on keeping that source of income intact. And, frankly it has to get harder and harder for someone getting older to watch the government's free handouts to people not working increase. Hell Im in my 30s and I cant stand that shit.

    For $20 you get Chachi, but $40 gets you Fonzie....

    Mickey Av

  • Mickey Av said...

    this couldnt be farther from the truth. But nice attempt at a blanket statement!

    Actually, the statement you posted is factually correct.

    This post was edited by cstory80 on 2/8/2012 at 11:16 AM

    cstory80

  • cstory80 said...

    Actually, the statement you posted is factually correct.

    Id have to see the numbers because I am of the understanding that higher EARNING people lean left.

    For $20 you get Chachi, but $40 gets you Fonzie....

    Mickey Av

  • Mickey Av said...

    Id have to see the numbers because I am of the understanding that higher EARNING people lean left.

    Okay. Go see the numbers and then come back and tell me that RB's statement was not correct.

    cstory80

  • cstory80 said...

    Okay. Go see the numbers and then come back and tell me that RB's statement was not correct.

    Okay. I just performed an online search and I didnt find anything I would classify as the "answer" to this question. But I found some blogs that covered this subject. Their research has democrats of college level education edging out republicans 30% to 27%. So maybe RB is correct. But then again, anyone who has taken a stats course knows there is always margain for error and these usually lie +-5%. So we didnt really get anywhere with this.

    If anyone else has concrete evidence Id love to see it. Interesting topic. But this also screams "my group is smarter than yours" so Im hesitant to get into this pissing contest that will inevitably go beyond the numbers into personal jabs.

    For $20 you get Chachi, but $40 gets you Fonzie....

    Mickey Av

  • Mickey Av said...

    Okay. I just performed an online search and I didnt find anything I would classify as the "answer" to this question. But I found some blogs that covered this subject. Their research has democrats of college level education edging out republicans 30% to 27%. So maybe RB is correct. But then again, anyone who has taken a stats course knows there is always margain for error and these usually lie +-5%. So we didnt really get anywhere with this.

    If anyone else has concrete evidence Id love to see it. Interesting topic. But this also screams "my group is smarter than yours" so Im hesitant to get into this pissing contest that will inevitably go beyond the numbers into personal jabs.

    IMO, we aren't discussing which group is smarter.

    What we are discussing is education level.

    cstory80

  • cstory80 said...

    IMO, we aren't discussing which group is smarter.

    What we are discussing is education level.

    I would assume those two are remotely related...but I hope you can see the context that I used for that quote. I dont know if there is any definite answer to the question. I would be interested to take it even further...what are the education level of the top earners and their political affiliations....would encompass entrepeneurs, hollywood etc. I think that would be interesting. I dont have the answer.

    For $20 you get Chachi, but $40 gets you Fonzie....

    Mickey Av

  • ca4usc said...

    Why do younger peeps lean to the left and as we grow older we start leanin to the right? not sure i've seen this talked about before, but i could be wrong.

    As I got older, I learned the difference between ideology and pragmatism.

    brdcstr1

  • Rosebowl91 said...

    you don't think my answer is intellectually honest?

    Funny thing about "intelligence", it is not exactly a black-white issue. In my work, I deal with business owners, developers, farmers, bankers, lawyers, accountants, etc. etc. etc. Some of the smartest people I have met have been farmers, and it is not because of some pretty diplomas they have, or their flowery prose, but due to their understanding of what works, how to solve problems, how to improve things, how to deal with people, etc. Is some professor who has advanced degrees and may be able to do well on an IQ test smarter than a farmer? Smarter than a developer? How can you measure that? Personally, I find the smartest people to be those that can solve problems and make things work, to be productive, even if against the odds.

    GauchoGreg

  • USCMichigander said...

    First and foremost what draws the youth into politics are not foreign political matters, tax debates, or things of that nature, social issues are comprehensible to a political novice and something they can get passionate about. The youth lean left socially across the board which is why the GOP will soon be forced to adopt "state's rights" on social issues instead of wanting to bar abortion and gay marriage across the board. Beyond that, at face value liberalism is the ideal. Everyone is equal, yaddi yaddi ya. My girlfriend is a very intelligent girl but she isn't very involved politically (she is very much into philosophy). Because of this, she doesn't understand political issues and can only discuss them by being vague. Conservatism is not "ideal" to the human nature compared to liberalism. It is work for what you get vs. collectively work together for what everyone gets. Which sounds nicer to you? I've longed to write a book entitled "Rethinking Utopia" in which I propose anarchy, not communism, is what we should strive towards.

    Good post. Completely agree. Not easy to fully understand things when you have yet to really live through them, and with so much of your time, growing up, listening to teachers and learning theories, and much less learning how things may really work, what really motivates people, and seeing how lethargy can set in when motivation is not forced. Very good of you to see through this at an early age.

    GauchoGreg

  • GauchoGreg said...

    Funny thing about "intelligence", it is not exactly a black-white issue. In my work, I deal with business owners, developers, farmers, bankers, lawyers, accountants, etc. etc. etc. Some of the smartest people I have met have been farmers, and it is not because of some pretty diplomas they have, or their flowery prose, but due to their understanding of what works, how to solve problems, how to improve things, how to deal with people, etc. Is some professor who has advanced degrees and may be able to do well on an IQ test smarter than a farmer? Smarter than a developer? How can you measure that? Personally, I find the smartest people to be those that can solve problems and make things work, to be productive, even if against the odds.

    Very well put.

    westcoastfball

  • GauchoGreg said...

    Funny thing about "intelligence", it is not exactly a black-white issue. In my work, I deal with business owners, developers, farmers, bankers, lawyers, accountants, etc. etc. etc. Some of the smartest people I have met have been farmers, and it is not because of some pretty diplomas they have, or their flowery prose, but due to their understanding of what works, how to solve problems, how to improve things, how to deal with people, etc. Is some professor who has advanced degrees and may be able to do well on an IQ test smarter than a farmer? Smarter than a developer? How can you measure that? Personally, I find the smartest people to be those that can solve problems and make things work, to be productive, even if against the odds.

    I agree with this wholeheartedly. In my profession I am surrounded by some of the brightest people in the legal world...yet I am fascinated with their inability to connect education with intelligence. Book smarts can get you a job, but practical application of life lessons brings intelligence. And, I also find (and beware of the hasty generalization here) the kids that spend 7-8 years of their lives burried in the books have a very tough time "understanding" the real world. I often find that their dedication to their education has retarded their social skills and their ability to see the big picture. Some of the "smartest" people Ive come across have jobs that one would not immediately define as "smart" by society's definition. Like mechanics for example. Or contractors (as stated above).

    This post was edited by Mickey Av on 2/8/2012 at 12:49 PM

    For $20 you get Chachi, but $40 gets you Fonzie....

    Mickey Av

  • GauchoGreg said...

    Good post. Completely agree. Not easy to fully understand things when you have yet to really live through them, and with so much of your time, growing up, listening to teachers and learning theories, and much less learning how things may really work, what really motivates people, and seeing how lethargy can set in when motivation is not forced. Very good of you to see through this at an early age.

    I think actually SEEING and EXPERIENCING things has a huge impact on how people think.

    As a kid, my dad worked ridiculously long hours to earn enough to bring my family from Cuba to this country. As they moved into our home, I saw, first hand how a communist ideology shapes a person's way of thinking and the sense of entitlement that people coming from that kind of system have.

    They expected a car, a home, a job, healthcare, food, etc ALL to be provided FOR them, and that they be compensated in year-one as well as the person who has been toiling at their trade for 25 years. They thought that my dad had spent 15 years in teh USA "living the good life" (an exact quote from one of my aunts) while they lived in tyranny in Cuba -- totally ignoring the fact that every spare penny my dad earned went to getting them out.

    It was THAT experience, more than anything that shaped my way of thinking against any socialist/communist ideology. It forced me to work harder and achieve more in order to prove to them that it was not a sense of entitlement that drives man, but rather a sense of accomplishment and achievement. Additionally, I also vowed that I would never rest to encourage people to fend for themselves, hold on to the thing for which they work so hard and advocate for the right for EVERYONE to succeed to the level that they desire.

    deetj13

  • phearsc said...

    You basically implied liberals are smarter than everyone else.

    My belief is that young people haven't yet accounted for human fallability and haven't been on their own long enough to have a sense of how much work and effort it takes to be successful. Ask a college student to average out their grades with the partiers and watch them all scoff - but these same college students will roundly defend socialism. Why? Simple. They own their grades, but they have none of their own money. As soon as they begin to feel the pinch in a personal way people begin to more closely examin just what is being done, and for whom, with that which is being taken from them. Nevermind that liberals have invaded academia. NOT because they are smarter, but as part of Alinksy's brilliant (albeit terribly immoral) plan/ideaology.

    As an aside, one might note that academics are also very disconnected from the "real" world, relatively low earning power compared to other graduate educated folks, (my g/f is a PhD student - so this isn't blind accusation, but rather careful observation) and are extremely dependent on gov grants for research. It is, once again, in their best interest for big brother, leftist gov to take care of them so they can focus on their research.

    Now I'll get 47 down votes from the 6 liberals and their 20 accounts and my rating will plunge again, as is always the case when I venture here to the OT forum. BTW when did this place become so F'ing liberal?

    Up votes from me. Easy to have high vote count when you are talking football, but speak your mind, no matter the logic behind you, and you will be labeled a bigot, or bitter, or whatever other fun label . . . . and get a down vote. Wear your lowered rating with pride!

    GauchoGreg

  • TrojanMonkey said...

    Anecdotally for me and people I grew up with and am still friends with "protecting our stuff" does not really come into play anymore when were older than it did when we were younger. I'd argue that I'm more willing / likely to give my stuff away now than i did when I was young and poor, mainly because I can spare it now. 20 year olds don't want to give away their stuff either.

    Now as I've seen more and more waste and mismanagement of the stuff that I have given to the gov't over the years I've thought to myself giving the gov't more of my stuff is just sending good stuff after bad. That's a concept I didn't practically understand until after I got out of college. Throwing stuff at a problem is often not a good fix and just leads more waste and a lot more abuse of my stuff.

    I agree with C on the social front. I think as people age they get more emotionally attached to the social norms and mores that are prevelant throughout their lives.

    I agree with your first paragraphy.

    Another thing, with me, is that I have seen just how much more I can do when I have had my back up against the wall . . . way more than I ever thought I could have done before, when I was relatively comfortable. It has made me realize, more and more, that so many of those that are "less priviliged" can do a hell of a lot more than they think they can, but it requires a push, rather than just a "fair" opportunity and "help".

    GauchoGreg

  • GauchoGreg said...

    Up votes from me. Easy to have high vote count when you are talking football, but speak your mind, no matter the logic behind you, and you will be labeled a bigot, or bitter, or whatever other fun label . . . . and get a down vote. Wear your lowered rating with pride!

    Who cares about stars? Neg me into oblivion for all I care

    signature image

    I will not be working with you, but against you. - USC Outsider

    USCMichigander