Online Now 636

Off Topic Board

FightOn247 message board for off topic posts

On this Board 144
Record: 1566 (5/28/2013)

Online now 629
Record: 4850 (6/6/2012)

Boards ▾

Fighton247 Board

The home for discussion on USC athletics

Off Topic Board

FightOn247 message board for off topic posts

Trojan News on the Net

Latest USC headlines from around the net

Reply

Reason why Romney won't release his tax returns

  • Dstyle said...

    Are you seriously a lawyer or are you messing with us, you can say it you are, we don't mind.

    Do you seriously have a brain or are you just messing with us? You can admit it if you don't. I won't mind.

    By the way, who is "we" in your post? On who else's behalf are you posting?

    Morethanafan

  • MJRuffalo said...

    There is only exactly one reason Romney will not release his tax returns. Anyone who disagrees is ignorant.

    Romney and his team believe that the information on his tax returns will hurt him more than the negative press and reaction he will get from not releasing them at all.

    Kind of like the Fast and Furious documents, the passport history, the Harvard Law Review, the school applications and financing, the grades, the...

    Low5Point

  • Low5Point said...

    Kind of like the Fast and Furious documents, the passport history, the Harvard Law Review, the school applications and financing, the grades, the...

    not to mention the origin of the Connecticut social security number, the Rezcko $3000,000 bribe (undoubtedly not reported as income), the history of Michelle's "no show" job, to name a few more unanswered and unchallenged (by the media) issues.

    old scotty

  • I see that conservatives are too embarrassed to stay on topic and feel a strong need to deflect in order to try to defend their candidate. What else is new?

    Morethanafan

  • Low5Point said...

    Kind of like the Fast and Furious documents, the passport history, the Harvard Law Review, the school applications and financing, the grades, the...

    The board would be a better place if at times like this, a conservative would step up and explain the argument as to why many view these situations as not being similiar.

    cstory80

  • cstory80 said...

    The board would be a better place if at times like this, a conservative would step up and explain the argument as to why many view these situations as not being similiar.

    sorry I can't help you here. You have said before that if you were a campaign advisor you would tell your guy not to release anymore than the law requires. It looks to me like you are saying Mitt should not follow your advise and instead release his tax records.

    Why do you think tax records are different than resume items and job performance related documentation.

    For me I think Romney should release his tax records and i think the Pres should cooperate more with the F&F investigation. At this point his grades don't matter to me unless he has made an issue of his grades (which I cannot recall him doing)

    This post was edited by TrojanMonkey on 7/19/2012 at 3:21 PM

    The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen - Dennis Prager

    TrojanMonkey

  • TrojanMonkey said...

    sorry I can't help you here. You have said before that if you were a campaign advisor you would tell your guy not to release anymore than the law requires. It looks to me like you are saying Mitt should not follow your advise and instead release his tax records.

    Why do you think tax records are different than resume items and job performance related documentation.

    For me I think Romney should release his tax records and i think the Pres should cooperate more with the F&F investigation. At this point his grades don't matter to me unless he has made an issue of his grades (which I cannot recall him doing)

    I wouldn't think that you would. No need for an apology.

    The reason I would point to tax returns being different than 30 year old transcripts is that we've become accustomed to candidates showing tax returns. It really has become part of what is expected. To my knowledge, no candidate has released transcript and passport type information.

    This post has been edited 3 times, most recently by cstory80 on 7/19/2012 at 3:32 PM

    cstory80

  • Morethanafan said...

    I see that conservatives are too embarrassed to stay on topic and feel a strong need to deflect in order to try to defend their candidate. What else is new?

    It's not deflection...it's more proof that you and others are ideologue hypocrites who demand something from the opposition that you do not demand from your side. Your hypocrisy knows no bounds and this is another in a long line of proofs of that fact.

    Low5Point

  • TrojanMonkey said...

    sorry I can't help you here. You have said before that if you were a campaign advisor you would tell your guy not to release anymore than the law requires. It looks to me like you are saying Mitt should not follow your advise and instead release his tax records.

    Why do you think tax records are different than resume items and job performance related documentation.

    For me I think Romney should release his tax records and i think the Pres should cooperate more with the F&F investigation. At this point his grades don't matter to me unless he has made an issue of his grades (which I cannot recall him doing)

    You believe that records that are two years old are equivalent to records from 30 years ago? You believe that records that have been provided by Presidents for decades are equivalent to records not ever produced by a candidate? Notice, Obama has produced his tax returns. Why haven't the birthers in this thread asked Romney for his birth certificate?

    Morethanafan

  • cstory80 said...

    I wouldn't think that you would. No need for an apology.

    The reason I would point to tax returns being different than 30 year old transcripts is that we've become accustomed to candidates showing tax returns. It really has become part of what is expected. To my knowledge, no candidate has released transcript and passport type information.

    a difference without a distinction.....

    relevant information.....

    if the voters have a right to know things about a candidate's background, it would seem reasonable that would include all things. If there are irregularities, seems that the public should get to know about it...

    His drug usage may have predated transcripts....I believe the public has a right to know all about it, the extent of it.....no need for the media to cover it up. Those in the public who do not care are free to disregard teh information....

    old scotty

  • cstory80 said...

    I wouldn't think that you would. No need for an apology.

    The reason I would point to tax returns being different than 30 year old transcripts is that we've become accustomed to candidates showing tax returns. It really has become part of what is expected. To my knowledge, no candidate has released transcript and passport type information.

    alright, I agree with that. But it's still not legally required. Are you changing your "only what is required by law" rule for the candidates you advise?

    Like I said, I like to see more, more, more. I want to know about their college, their jobs, their charity involvement, their criminal records, their military records. This is the most important job in the world and I want us all to have as much as possible

    The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen - Dennis Prager

    TrojanMonkey

  • Low5Point said...

    It's not deflection...it's more proof that you and others are ideologue hypocrites who demand something from the opposition that you do not demand from your side. Your hypocrisy knows no bounds and this is another in a long line of proofs of that fact.

    I will try to make this simple so that even mentailly challenged conservative posters, such as yourself, can understand. Even if everything you wrote is true, it is a deflection. This thread is not about what anyone demands or hypocrisy. It is about the reason Romney does not produce his tax records.

    Your facts are as bad as your logic. No one is asking for anything Obama would not produce. He produced his tax records. We are asking for tax records. I.e., we are asking for the same thing that Obama and several Presidents before him produced. The hypocrisy you are writing about is by the Republicans. I do not see anyone asking Romney for his college transcripts, funding for college, or long form birth certificate. In fact, no Republican has asked that of any previous President.

    Morethanafan

  • Morethanafan said...

    You believe that records that are two years old are equivalent to records from 30 years ago? You believe that records that have been provided by Presidents for decades are equivalent to records not ever produced by a candidate? Notice, Obama has produced his tax returns. Why haven't the birthers in this thread asked Romney for his birth certificate?

    who are the birthers in this thread?

    fyi..I want to Romney to release his returns, as well as his transcripts, and if it turns out his father was a foreign national I would like to see his birth certificate, etc...

    The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen - Dennis Prager

    TrojanMonkey

  • TrojanMonkey said...

    alright, I agree with that. But it's still not legally required. Are you changing your "only what is required by law" rule for the candidates you advise?

    Like I said, I like to see more, more, more. I want to know about their college, their jobs, their charity involvement, their criminal records, their military records. This is the most important job in the world and I want us all to have as much as possible

    Once before, I asked how any of that would influence your vote. You responded that you did not know. If the stuff is so irrelevant that it would not influence a vote, why do you want to see it? Should a presidential candidate be required to produce a log of when he or she had sex with his or her spouse?

    Perhaps what would be better would be a list of items that a presidential candidate is required to submit. Then we would get rid of this nonsense. Until then, relevant documents should be provided and irrelevant ones are not necessary.

    Getting back to the subject of the thread, why do you believe Romney won't provide tax returns?

    This post was edited by Morethanafan on 7/19/2012 at 3:47 PM

    Morethanafan

  • Morethanafan said...

    I see that conservatives are too embarrassed to stay on topic and feel a strong need to deflect in order to try to defend their candidate. What else is new?

    What advantage is there to him releasing more tax returns? He's going to be attacked for them regardless of whether he releases or not...just like he has been for the returns that have been released as required.

    stevetrojanman

  • TrojanMonkey said...

    alright, I agree with that. But it's still not legally required. Are you changing your "only what is required by law" rule for the candidates you advise?

    Like I said, I like to see more, more, more. I want to know about their college, their jobs, their charity involvement, their criminal records, their military records. This is the most important job in the world and I want us all to have as much as possible

    You seem to miss a shit load of posts, but then you swear up and down that we should take your word when you state that another poster has posted something that he denies.

    I've said many, many, many times that if candidates came to me for advice on this subject, I would advise them to not release anything that is not legally required.....and/or anything the candidate/campaign does not feel is necessary.

    You've actually responded to posts in which I have stated my position. Do you no longer remember what I have said on the subject? Do you believe I have stated something different in this thread?

    cstory80

  • stevetrojanman said...

    What advantage is there to him releasing more tax returns? He's going to be attacked for them regardless of whether he releases or not...just like he has been for the returns that have been released as required.

    Unless there is something that the public would perceive as really bad (I gave a couple of examples in my original post), he will not be attacked any more for them than he is already subject to. That is just false logic. People already know that he made a lot of money and took a lot of deductions. If he does not release them then people believe he is hiding something really bad. Probably, because he is.

    Holder could have asserted his 5th Amendment rights when called to testify before Congress. Is it your position that he should have, because he should not give more information than is necessary? If he had, don't you believe there would have been loud calls for his resignation and that Obama would have forced it? Don't you believe that people would have inferred that he was guilty of something serious if he had done that?

    Morethanafan

  • wake6830 said...

    Do you have first- or even second-hand knowledge of his skills as a lawyer? You don't like the guy, we get it, but he's been a lawyer for a long time and is now the CEO of a company that is doing well as far as you know. I don't agree with most of the things you post but I wouldn't say that you are bad at your job - you've been doing it long enough that you obviously have some skill at it.

    Well said.

    OldTrojan

  • Morethanafan said...

    I see that conservatives are too embarrassed to stay on topic

    Says the chairman of the

    attachment

    Gr8ytHunter

  • Morethanafan said...

    Unless there is something that the public would perceive as really bad (I gave a couple of examples in my original post), he will not be attacked any more for them than he is already subject to. That is just false logic. People already know that he made a lot of money and took a lot of deductions. If he does not release them then people believe he is hiding something really bad. Probably, because he is.

    Holder could have asserted his 5th Amendment rights when called to testify before Congress. Is it your position that he should have, because he should not give more information than is necessary? If he had, don't you believe there would have been loud calls for his resignation and that Obama would have forced it? Don't you believe that people would have inferred that he was guilty of something serious if he had done that?

    That is a significant leap to a conclusion and something that is not really related...

    Romney isn't being subpoenaed and he isn't testifying in front of congress or a courtroom. Romney has complied with the requirements regarding his tax returns. If people are unhappy with the rules for income tax return disclosures, it's possible to change the rules to make them more stringent.

    Holder could have asserted his 5th amendment rights, sure, but being as he was testifying in a congressional inquiry, I'd say that the stakes were a little bit higher with regard to the seriousness of the situation. Calls were made for his resignation even before he lied to congress. Him saying nothing wouldn't have made them go away.

    There is no reason for Romney to disclose additional information when all it will do is lead to additional campaign fodder. In my opinion, it is better to let the President campaign on him not releasing enough information, and for him to simply say that I have complied with all of the rules required of my campaign with regards to the release of information. As I said previously, the President devoting his campaigning to Romney's tax records from 4 years ago will get real old, real fast.

    stevetrojanman

  • Morethanafan said...

    I will try to make this simple so that even mentailly challenged conservative posters, such as yourself, can understand. Even if everything you wrote is true, it is a deflection. This thread is not about what anyone demands or hypocrisy. It is about the reason Romney does not produce his tax records.

    Your facts are as bad as your logic. No one is asking for anything Obama would not produce. He produced his tax records. We are asking for tax records. I.e., we are asking for the same thing that Obama and several Presidents before him produced. The hypocrisy you are writing about is by the Republicans. I do not see anyone asking Romney for his college transcripts, funding for college, or long form birth certificate. In fact, no Republican has asked that of any previous President.

    People have been asking for this information from Obama for over 4 years...this is no new request. He staked his reputation, position and qualifications on those things he has kept hidden.

    But when it comes right down to it, the request for Romney's tax returns is the ultimate DEFLECTION. It is left, and their whores in the media, attempt to deflect from that which is actually important in this election...the ECONOMY! But you and the rest of left don't want to, nor can you, defend, support and promote this administrations abysmal record on the economy and so the constant deflection of Bain, tax returns and dogs on roofs DEFLECT from the real issues. You lefties are hiding from the truth and can't deal with the fact your Messiah has fucked up everything and has a loooooooong trail of obfuscation and lack of transparency. the hypocrisy is the refusal to either see it or admit it.

    Low5Point

  • Low5Point said...

    People have been asking for this information from Obama for over 4 years...this is no new request. He staked his reputation, position and qualifications on those things he has kept hidden.

    But when it comes right down to it, the request for Romney's tax returns is the ultimate DEFLECTION. It is left, and their whores in the media, attempt to deflect from that which is actually important in this election...the ECONOMY! But you and the rest of left don't want to, nor can you, defend, support and promote this administrations abysmal record on the economy and so the constant deflection of Bain, tax returns and dogs on roofs DEFLECT from the real issues. You lefties are hiding from the truth and can't deal with the fact your Messiah has fucked up everything and has a loooooooong trail of obfuscation and lack of transparency. the hypocrisy is the refusal to either see it or admit it.

    This....

    I admire Romney for refusing to buckle under. He would look weak if he did....

    I disagree that this is actually hurting him. It is making him look strong. The people doing all the screaming, all the demanding.....are not worth his trouble. Not one single one of them would vote for him or support him if he released every tax return he ever filed. It could show that he is actually a pauper, having given all his money away (as he apparently did with his inheritance)....and they would not support him. It could show anything, good or bad, and none of these people would support him.

    His strategy is similar to that of Obama about the birther stuff.....(I remind people that it was the left who originally started the demanding,....his opponents in the Democrati primaries)....He ignored it and "birthers were soon regarded as petty. That will not happen here, because Romney does not have the sycophanic media that Obama had......but there is nothing to be gained by him knuckling under now.

    I thank Wordafa in advance for the ubiquitous downvote that is coming....

    This post was edited by old scotty on 7/19/2012 at 4:39 PM

    old scotty

  • old scotty said...

    This....

    I admire Romney for refusing to buckle under. He would look weak if he did....

    I disagree that this is actually hurting him. It is making him look strong. The people doing all the screaming, all the demanding.....are not worth his trouble. Not one single one of them would vote for him or support him if he released every tax return he ever filed. It could show that he is actually a pauper, having given all his money away (as he apparently did with his inheritance)....and they would not support him. It could show anything, good or bad, and none of these people would support him.

    His strategy is similar to that of Obama about the birther stuff.....(I remind people that it was the left who originally started the demanding,....his opponents in the Democrati primaries)....He ignored it and "birthers were soon regarded as petty. That will not happen here, because Romney does not have the sycophanic media that Obama had......but there is nothing to be gained by him knuckling under now.

    I thank Wordafa in advance for the ubiquitous downvote that is coming....

    You are aware that a number of prominent conservatives and conservative publications have called for him to release additional returns, right?

    Do you think Bill Kristol, Haley Barbour, George Will and the fine folks at NRO are planning to vote for Obama?

    wake6830

  • Morethanafan said...

    Once before, I asked how any of that would influence your vote. You responded that you did not know. If the stuff is so irrelevant that it would not influence a vote, why do you want to see it? Should a presidential candidate be required to produce a log of when he or she had sex with his or her spouse?

    Perhaps what would be better would be a list of items that a presidential candidate is required to submit. Then we would get rid of this nonsense. Until then, relevant documents should be provided and irrelevant ones are not necessary.

    Getting back to the subject of the thread, why do you believe Romney won't provide tax returns?

    It would definitely influence my voting in primary. As far as the Main election goes, it would make me feel a lot better about the guy if I knew as much about him as possible. Even with regards to faith in him while his doing the job. I wish I knew Pres Obama was the academic superstar many claim he is. Knowing he was completely clean in F&F wouldn't get me to vote for him either but it would make me feel better if I knew that. I don't believe he was born in Kenya but I wished he would have caved sooner just so I wouldn't have to hear about it.

    I think I would like a list for all candidates for POTUS to submit. My list would apparently be much longer than yours and C's.

    I don't know if Romney will provide them or not. I have no idea.

    The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen - Dennis Prager

    TrojanMonkey

  • cstory80 said...

    You seem to miss a shit load of posts, but then you swear up and down that we should take your word when you state that another poster has posted something that he denies.

    I've said many, many, many times that if candidates came to me for advice on this subject, I would advise them to not release anything that is not legally required.....and/or anything the candidate/campaign does not feel is necessary.

    You've actually responded to posts in which I have stated my position. Do you no longer remember what I have said on the subject? Do you believe I have stated something different in this thread?

    I totally remember that posts...that's why I brought it up. I was surprised to see you imply that Romney should release his tax returns (which I believe you did by saying that those are different than transcripts, F&F, etc...)

    The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen - Dennis Prager

    TrojanMonkey