Online Now 598

Off Topic Board

FightOn247 message board for off topic posts

On this Board 143
Record: 953 (11/5/2012)

Online now 629
Record: 4850 (6/6/2012)

Boards ▾

Fighton247 Board

The home for discussion on USC athletics

Off Topic Board

FightOn247 message board for off topic posts

Trojan News on the Net

Latest USC headlines from around the net

Reply

Democrats registering the dead?

  • old scotty said...

    yeah, well I worked with the Registrar of Voters on this issue, when we were investigating claims of fraud, saw how they "checked" signatures. She was in my office several times, and I made a few trips to her place in Downey.

    This is not exactly scientific "testing". Catching this is not easy.

    Let us not forget, at least 700 did fraudulently vote in the Loretta Sanchez election, and those are merely the ones which were caught. Most likely there were many many more who got away with it

    NO 700 did not vote fraudulently in Lorretta Sanchez's race. AS I SHOWED YOU BEFORE....More than half of those were found to be valid.

    There was no decision on the others....MY suspicion was at this stage of the game nobody cared anymore.

    But the answer is that is not so. The congress did their search and alleged the 700 and left there and then walked away. In subsequent investigations as I showed you in a previous thread about 300 were found to be valid. (THe Brennan Center showed that!)

    THat is quite dishonest to continue to repeat that story. And the idea that not catching these things is not scientific is again nonsense. As I stated they are still reviewing information from the November 5th election. Again you could solve this problem by showing an election where there were a huge number of fraudulent votes and those votes changed the course of the election. Or a large number of dead people who weren't supposed to vote had voted.

    No such evidence exists. Even the Republicans in the Sanchez-Dornan race conceded that they did not have evidence sufficient to overturn the election.

    signature image

    Tous pour un, un pour tous

    D A Stankovich

  • tommytrojan1122 said...

    Do you deny voter fraud happens?

    How do you explain Garfield County had more votes cast than the number of actual registered votors. Thank God Drake Sabitch uncovered the plot and proved that Donnelly won the Governor's seat.

    I don't like Chris Farley Except for Matt Foley...but then I found out about him while living in a VAN DOWN BY THE RIVER...lol

    signature image

    Tous pour un, un pour tous

    D A Stankovich

  • D A Stankovich said...

    NO 700 did not vote fraudulently in Lorretta Sanchez's race. AS I SHOWED YOU BEFORE....More than half of those were found to be valid.

    There was no decision on the others....MY suspicion was at this stage of the game nobody cared anymore.

    But the answer is that is not so. The congress did their search and alleged the 700 and left there and then walked away. In subsequent investigations as I showed you in a previous thread about 300 were found to be valid. (THe Brennan Center showed that!)

    THat is quite dishonest to continue to repeat that story. And the idea that not catching these things is not scientific is again nonsense. As I stated they are still reviewing information from the November 5th election. Again you could solve this problem by showing an election where there were a huge number of fraudulent votes and those votes changed the course of the election. Or a large number of dead people who weren't supposed to vote had voted.

    No such evidence exists. Even the Republicans in the Sanchez-Dornan race conceded that they did not have evidence sufficient to overturn the election.

    some Republicans, not "the Republicans" and you never disproved, nor did anyone else that there were not at least 700 fraudulent votes in the Sanchez election., You call me dishonest. I call you dishonest for presenting only the Democrat/Sanchez version.

    No dispute, the investigation was dropped. No dispute, they never got to the bottom of it, or of La Hermandad, and they should have.

    John Fund's well researched scholarly book showed that there were at least 700 fraudulent votes in that election. You were not working in the Orange ?County office to stop that one.

    This post was edited by old scotty on 7/26/2012 at 8:39 PM

    old scotty

  • deetj13 said...

    Do you deny that improperly registering voters is the first step towards voter fraud?

    Should we just let this go, and put all of the responsibility on the people verifying signatures? I would imagine that you would be in favor of stopping this at the source, rather than taking the chance that they might slip through and destroy your premise that voter fraud does not happen.

    These idiots have done this for years.

    Actually if you want to stop it. The way to stop is to stop paying people to collect signatures. That is where fraudulent signatures get turned in. Because the signatory has a reason to turn in signatures. The more they get in the more they get paid.

    THAT IS WHY I NEVER SIGN PETITIONS OR ANY OF THAT SHIT ANYMORE. It causes the full employment for political consultants act. They just keep throwing ballot issues at us. It makes a mess of government and it makes us dubious of the elections system because silly political issues that are not important get thrown at us..

    The real place where Election Fraud happens is at the level of elected officials They can pervert the process. But again voter i.d. would not solve that problem. The problem of course is easier to keep under control when you have a vigilant state official to make sure that the certification of the election by the local election official is honest and correct.

    signature image

    Tous pour un, un pour tous

    D A Stankovich

  • Trojan Conquest said...

    Sure, but are their birth certificates real?

    McCain's maybe not...lol There is some question as to where he was born and he did perjure himself on his married certificate!

    signature image

    Tous pour un, un pour tous

    D A Stankovich

  • D A Stankovich said...

    These idiots have done this for years.

    Actually if you want to stop it. The way to stop is to stop paying people to collect signatures. That is where fraudulent signatures get turned in. Because the signatory has a reason to turn in signatures. The more they get in the more they get paid.

    THAT IS WHY I NEVER SIGN PETITIONS OR ANY OF THAT SHIT ANYMORE. It causes the full employment for political consultants act. They just keep throwing ballot issues at us. It makes a mess of government and it makes us dubious of the elections system because silly political issues that are not important get thrown at us..

    The real place where Election Fraud happens is at the level of elected officials They can pervert the process. But again voter i.d. would not solve that problem. The problem of course is easier to keep under control when you have a vigilant state official to make sure that the certification of the election by the local election official is honest and correct.

    I am with you on banning people collecting signatures.....bully for you...

    How about coming the rest of the way....no voter registration drives, no community organizing, no collecting of absentee ballots,

    old scotty

  • old scotty said...

    I am with you on banning people collecting signatures.....bully for you...

    How about coming the rest of the way....no voter registration drives, no community organizing, no collecting of absentee ballots,

    Sure you chuck in that there is no corporate involvement in politics. All contributions must be identified and that we go to a system of public financing and you are on....

    signature image

    Tous pour un, un pour tous

    D A Stankovich

  • D A Stankovich said...

    Sure you chuck in that there is no corporate involvement in politics. All contributions must be identified and that we go to a system of public financing and you are on....

    I would prefer outlawing television and radio ads altogether....and do not talk about the First Amendment, those ads present a clear and present danger of harm, and are not protected speech.

    But, outlawing contributions from left wing unions has to be in there with corporate ourtawing...what is good for the goose

    old scotty