In partnership with CBSSports.com
The home for discussion on USC athletics
FightOn247 message board for off topic posts
You have no favorite boards.
The most viewed topics.
The most replied to topics.
The most up-voted topics.
The most down-voted topics.
The most up-voted posters.
The most down-voted posters.
The most followed posters.
Are you mentally retarded? I pointed out that you keep interceding in disagreements that I have with others with insulting posts and accuse you of stalking. You, in all caps claim that you responded to only "ONE" post. Now you are claiming that meant that you only responded to that one post once? Are you kidding? I do not believe that you are in your late 20s unless you are mentally retarded.
You are not responding to my posts directed at you. You have responded to ALL of my posts in which I disagreed with someone and did so very insultingly even though I had not directed the post to you. There is something seriously wrong with you.
You do not have the qualifications to assess whether he is mentally retarded.
TT/Funky, is that you?
No. Wasn't TT/Funky Michigander?
Dude... you have quarrels with everyone on this board you deem to be "conservative" in just about every thread. Last I checked I only replied to a fraction of them. But alas the hyperbole master who couldn't hack bulge bracket banking dubs a fraction to be "ALL".
You've forgotten you're own history on these boards. It hasn't been libs that have had the most serious problems with you over the years. The people that have disliked you the most were South OC cons/rightists. True story.
I don't dislike you. I understand you. I wish you well.
Do you believe the 75,000 views mean 75,000 different people? Seriously?
That had nothing to do with politics and was my unwillingness to stand back from the standard bullying of the old "inner circle" when anyone dared to fire back at them. Other people took that as an opportunity to do some things that got blamed on me (later proven that it wasn't me) and the whole thing blew up.
Cry Havoc; and let slip the dogs of war!
I didn't say it had anything to do with politics. What I did do is correctly point out that some of the folks that have had the biggest problem with you were not libs.
Do you believe only 10 people got a thread up to 75,000 views? Seriously?
Why do you have such a hard time making the CORRECT inference? I think that's what bothers me about you so much - you consistently (and I think intentionally) draw absurdly uncharitable conclusions and then build your case against your opponent based on them. You must win a lot of arguments in your head when you're constantly jousting with windmills.
The point was it takes a reasonably large amount of people to get a thread to 75,000 views - NOT that "views" are each a unique user. I even almost clarified it in my post and thought, "no need - the point is obvious." I forgot to factor in the fact that some people don't care about truth - they care about winning.
They aren't the ones saying, "You always brag" after baiting me with, "You're stupid and don't know what you're talking about." They had a different quarrel.
How long is my run in with a small group of people known for clawing at everyone (How many people did A-51 get into it with for example?) going to be the sum total of these personal attacks on this forum? Shall we define you by your quarrel with the same people or your past dishonesty in using sock puppets? You seem to act as though my having argued with them somehow shines a poor light on me. To the contrary, I think a man can be judged by his friends AND his enemies and I'm not terribly worried that this particular group's past discontent (the situation has largely been smoothed over) is exactly a black mark on my record.
This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by phear_SC 14 months ago
Chris and I are making the point that this has nothing to do with politics. YOU implicitly argued that it is a lib/con thing. We are both arguing that it is you. I share Chris sentiments of not even disliking you. Notice, when you were civil in other threads, I responded to you in kind. When you have attacked, I have responded to you in kind. Interestingly, you thought that some libs (I believe you put me in that category and I was one of them) would be happy about your recent misfortune. Quite the contrary. I had been in a somewhat similar situation many years ago in a different industry and felt your pain. Again, I do not dislike you. It would be in your best interest to stop acting like a bull in a china shop though. You do not need to constantly put others down and tell everyone how wonderful you are. That is what gives others the appearance of you being insecure and it comes across very badly.
Chief, what you believe to be true about me using sock puppets to attack others is not true. I was always up front when I created a new handle. In fact, i was so up front about the whole thing that i would use avatars that people would know only I would use. Again, true story.
Thank you. This is exactly what I was trying to say.
I know he wouldn't listen if it came from me, so that is why I stated that if he has made any friends here over the years, hopefully they would clue him in as to how he is coming across.
Your purely altruistic motives for making these comments about me are inspiring ...
Funny, I could say the same thing.
And, if you go back and check the thread history, you started this most recent debacle which undermines your notion of reflexive civility.
This thread is cattier than three queens out for a night of drinking at Mickey's in West Hollywood!
Join the fight for YOUR liberty!
Where do you believe I started it (I do not even know which thread to start). I'll go back and look.
This post was edited by Morethanafan 14 months ago
Phear, it is clear that you started the attacks in this thread. Look at the posts on the first page. I believe all of our arguments have been started by you. When you get in an argument, I believe you lose objectivity. Take a look at your and my posts on the first page of this thread. If you believe I started this in another thread, I am willing to go back and look. Let me know a thread where you believe I started an attack on you. I do not believe you can find such a thread. As a suggestion, take a step back and look at the posts between you and I in this thread. This is a common theme. You are very insulting. I respond. It goes back and forth usually with you trying to argue how you are the eminent authority on the subject and insulting me personally. Your insult is frequently irrational, even insulting or denying what I do for a living even though you have no way of knowing. That cannot be the best way to deal with people.
The Real Housewives of the OT Board. We'll co-produce. In?
“Close tax loopholes that allow some of the truly wealthy to avoid paying their fair share,” Reagan vowed.
scmarine claimed that he would write a book about the board.
In the move adaptation, crazy Nick Cage will play BD.
Uh oh. The king of self-publication? Prepare for a REALLY gay stereotype of yours truly! SCMarine thinks I'm no bueno!
BD will have to play himself. No one could replicate that.
247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports