-
TrojanSeij1
- 4 stars Rating: 63
1539 votes total - (1503)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
trojanfolife
- 4 stars Rating: 71
1070 votes total - (1830)
- 21 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
trojanfolife said...
I think it's the SC factor ,once a recruit attach the SC logo besides their name they receive the benefit of the doubt based off our coaches recruiting history and talent evaluation,after all they are better suited for judging talent than the stiffs sitting behind the desk whom most have never played on a collegiate level are played football at all for that matter it's all youtube highlite reels for them nothing else.
-
trojanfolife said...
I think it's the SC factor ,once a recruit attach the SC logo besides their name they receive the benefit of the doubt based off our coaches recruiting history and talent evaluation,after all they are better suited for judging talent than the stiffs sitting behind the desk whom most have never played on a collegiate level are played football at all for that matter it's all youtube highlite reels for them nothing else.
TrojanMindSC
- 5 stars Rating: 83
3383 votes total - (3308)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
TrojanEconomist
- 5 stars Rating: 95
749 votes total - (1353)
- 21 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
trojanfolife
- 4 stars Rating: 71
1070 votes total - (1830)
- 21 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
TrojanMindSC said...
Not for Scout. Scout is actually very pro UCLA leans and the west coast because BRO is one of their biggest sites and Huffman and Biggins play a big role in BRO.
Love to see USC prospects ranked highly, but Scouts rankings are pretty bad when compared to Rivals or 247.
It's the weed capital of the world. Long dreads. Girls with hairy armpits. Where there's hippies, there's weed - Oregon Duck Reuben Droughns
-
TrojanMindSC said...
Not for Scout. Scout is actually very pro UCLA leans and the west coast because BRO is one of their biggest sites and Huffman and Biggins play a big role in BRO.
Love to see USC prospects ranked highly, but Scouts rankings are pretty bad when compared to Rivals or 247.
Pretty bad sometimes (Scout). Maybe. However, I agree with them this year in this:
May Browne #1 QB
Ty Isaac #1 RB (Neither 247 or Rivals has Isaac as number one RB. To that I say huh?
Also, Isaac is 4-stars with 247 and Rivals but 5-star with Scout
Justin Davis #3 RB (higher than both 247 and Rivals). Also, Davis is 4-stars with 247 and Rivals
but 5-star with Scout
Michael Hutchings (4-star with 247 and Rivals and 5-star with Scout).
In any case, it’s not just because I want SC commits or leans to be ranked higher. I just think IMO the aforementioned are underrated; but really, other than that, it’s not a big issue to me. The players the coaches want are top notch!
westcoastrules
- 5 stars Rating: 81
418 votes total - (410)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
OxyTrojan said...
My pleasure, on our current roster, of the players ranked by at least two of the four major sites (scout, rivals, espn, 247), here is the ratio of each site that ranks our player highest or lowest respectively.
Rivals, 23 players ranked highest, 11 ranked lowest 247, 10 players ranked highest, 6 ranked lowest espn, 20 ranked highest, 23 ranked lowest scout, 13 ranked highest, 21 ranked lowest
ESPN ranked these players higher than any of the other sites (there are a whole bunch I'm not listing) Matt Barkley #1 overall Antuan Woods, #33 overall Cyrus Hobbi, #34 overall John Martinez, #41 overall Kevin Graf, #43 overall DJ Morgan, #44 overall Jesse Scroggins, #55 overall
-
OxyTrojan said...
ESPN ranked these players higher than any of the other sites (there are a whole bunch I'm not listing) Matt Barkley #1 overall Antuan Woods, #33 overall Cyrus Hobbi, #34 overall John Martinez, #41 overall Kevin Graf, #43 overall DJ Morgan, #44 overall Jesse Scroggins, #55 overall
TrojanMindSC
- 5 stars Rating: 83
3383 votes total - (3308)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Chris Swanson
- 5 stars Rating: 91
2686 votes total - (6464)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
TrojanTW said...
Interesting....but there are different ways to decipher the data. While ESPN may have ranked some of the players the highest, they also ranked the most players lowest at their position.
Regardless, at the end of the day, I only care about how they perform once they're on the field for USC
BTW, my high school graduation was at the amphitheatre on the campus of Oxy...Go Tigers!!
-
OxyTrojan said...
My pleasure, on our current roster, of the players ranked by at least two of the four major sites (scout, rivals, espn, 247), here is the ratio of each site that ranks our player highest or lowest respectively.
Rivals, 23 players ranked highest, 11 ranked lowest 247, 10 players ranked highest, 6 ranked lowest espn, 20 ranked highest, 23 ranked lowest scout, 13 ranked highest, 21 ranked lowest
ESPN ranked these players higher than any of the other sites (there are a whole bunch I'm not listing) Matt Barkley #1 overall Antuan Woods, #33 overall Cyrus Hobbi, #34 overall John Martinez, #41 overall Kevin Graf, #43 overall DJ Morgan, #44 overall Jesse Scroggins, #55 overall
randy88moss
- 5 stars Rating: 88
5929 votes total - Certified DILF
- (7371)
- 21 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
USC recruits soaring up in rankings.