-
AbsenteeTrojan said...
IronMike asked: "What could possibly be done to the NCAA if documents were destroyed, and this was subsequently discovered."
I disagree that you say that not much will be done except hold the NCAA in contempt of court.
FRCP 37(b)(2)(a)(i-vii) would control what happens if a party destroys documents in order to disobey a court order.
The court could: - Direct that the claims made by McNair be taken as established for purposes of the action - Prohibit the NCAA from opposing McNair's claims or prohibit the NCAA from introducing certain evidence - Render a default against the NCAA and in favor of McNair
Those are all pretty harsh penalties, and the NCAA definitely doesn't want to risk those.
The only thing that the NCAA could really rely on to protect them (if they actually tried this) is FRCP 37(e), which deals with failure to provide electronically stored information. That statute states that a court cannot impose sanctions, but ONLY in the event that the documents were lost as the result of a routine, good-faith operation of their computer systems. There's no way that would work in this case, as investigators would disprove that claim in a heartbeat.
Beware, so long as you live, of judging men by their outward appearance. -- Jean de La Fontaine
-
achindah said...
AbsenteeTrojan:
How's it going? I agree and paraphrased FRCP 37 in several of my responses, to include my response to IronMike when I said "doing so will almost ensure McNair's victory"...Deleting or withholding emails will be contempt of court and will cause more issues including fines and POSSIBLE jail time. The key piece and one of the most damaging is that Dees can not refuse to talk. Could try to plead the 5th but that is unlikely to be allowed unless he did something criminal. You can assert the 5th Amendment in civil proceedings, but, unlike in criminal proceedings, a jury can be told about it and can assume the statements would have been damaging.
As this is not a criminal case again the damages will be limited to those you cited in FRCP 37. If there is a smoking gun the NCAA will settle before allowing either Dees to speak or the emails to be released.
AbsenteeTrojan
- 4 stars Rating: 73
407 votes total - (738)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
AbsenteeTrojan said...
It's going well except for my impending copyrights final. Sorry about essay answer, but CivPro is still somewhat fresh in my mind and I'm obviously in finals mode.
Looking back, I realize that you implied FRCP 37 when you wrote "doing so will almost ensure McNair's victory", but my reply wasn't a complete waste of time because now IronMike knows that if the NCAA did that, the court could essentially hand McNair the case with the methods I outlined.
However, like you said... none of this is going to matter when the NCAA settles. Too bad, too. I'm curious to see what sort of lies were being spread around by the committee, etc.
-
AbsenteeTrojan said...
It's going well except for my impending copyrights final. Sorry about essay answer, but CivPro is still somewhat fresh in my mind and I'm obviously in finals mode.
Looking back, I realize that you implied FRCP 37 when you wrote "doing so will almost ensure McNair's victory", but my reply wasn't a complete waste of time because now IronMike knows that if the NCAA did that, the court could essentially hand McNair the case with the methods I outlined.
However, like you said... none of this is going to matter when the NCAA settles. Too bad, too. I'm curious to see what sort of lies were being spread around by the committee, etc.
This post was edited by IRONMIKE4SC on 5/6/2012 at 12:08 AM
IRONMIKE4SC
- 5 stars Rating: 84
1534 votes total - M&G Coordinator; Gnutt-Buster Extraordinaire; Posting Coach to those dumb enough to listen!
- (2624)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
AbsenteeTrojan
- 4 stars Rating: 73
407 votes total - (738)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
AbsenteeTrojan said...
It's going well except for my impending copyrights final. Sorry about essay answer, but CivPro is still somewhat fresh in my mind and I'm obviously in finals mode.
Looking back, I realize that you implied FRCP 37 when you wrote "doing so will almost ensure McNair's victory", but my reply wasn't a complete waste of time because now IronMike knows that if the NCAA did that, the court could essentially hand McNair the case with the methods I outlined.
However, like you said... none of this is going to matter when the NCAA settles. Too bad, too. I'm curious to see what sort of lies were being spread around by the committee, etc.
Beware, so long as you live, of judging men by their outward appearance. -- Jean de La Fontaine
-
AbsenteeTrojan
- 4 stars Rating: 73
407 votes total - (738)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
IRONMIKE4SC said...
Out of curiosity, what is to prevent an agency such as the NCAA in this case, from producing only some of the mail, but not all... after carefully reviewing the documentation and ensuring there is no reference or telltale trail to some of the potentially more incriminating emails that might be conveniently omitted from their document production?
Would seem to me that someone would have been hard at work mitigating this as a potential damaging issue for quite some time.
What is happiness? The feeling that power is growing, that resistance is overcome.--Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche
-
AbsenteeTrojan said...
IronMike, that's all true. McNair may want justice served; he may see this all the way through to the end of a trial. However, you can never underestimate the power of a check handed to you with a number followed by six zeros: X,000,000.
I can't see him turning that down.
ArsenalTrojan
- 5 stars Rating: 96
254 votes total - (425)
- 21 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
ArsenalTrojan said...
This is what I am concerned about too. It's easy for us, who uniformly hate the NCAA, to want to try every way possible to overthrow it. But a person like McNair very well may see it as a chance to make big bucks, and if some of the not-so-flattering reports about McNair's character are true then I wouldn't be surprised if he chooses to do so.
I hope I am wrong, but I do fear that this will be settled out of court.
AbsenteeTrojan
- 4 stars Rating: 73
407 votes total - (738)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
AbsenteeTrojan said...
It doesn't take someone with bad character to accept a settlement worth millions of dollars.
I have no clue about his family situation, but the financial health of his personal life should be a priority far higher than receiving justice for USC.
And don't get me wrong, I would love for him to take this all the way to the end so that the NCAA gets what they deserve... but are you really saying that if McNair settles for something like $5,000,000, it reflects poorly on his character?
That type of money can make an individual (or family) financially secure for the rest of their lives if handled correctly.
ArsenalTrojan
- 5 stars Rating: 96
254 votes total - (425)
- 21 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
AbsenteeTrojan
- 4 stars Rating: 73
407 votes total - (738)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
AbsenteeTrojan said...
IronMike, that's all true. McNair may want justice served; he may see this all the way through to the end of a trial. However, you can never underestimate the power of a check handed to you with a number followed by six zeros: X,000,000.
I can't see him turning that down.
rkinslow: No problem. The analysis is a good exercise for me, lol. And it gets me away from studying for a few minutes.
-
brdcstr1 said...
I'm going to dream/hope/fantasize here a bit.
Wouldn't it be nice if a number of wealthy alums stepped up and offered to match the NCAA's buyout offer in the event Todd took the case to court and lost?
He would still have a guaranteed settlement, but far more important, he would have an opportunity to clear his name and regain his reputation. Not to mention the similar benefits it would hold for USC, the institution.
Maybe I'm being a bit unrealistic, but what is the price tag of someones reputation? If the record is sealed, the NCAA still controls the narrative and could blow it off as if it was cheaper to buy him out than go to court, since no one would know what the buyout figure was.
Todd would still have a dark cloud of suspicion hanging over his head, even though he would have a much fatter bank account.
In many ways, he holds the keys to the NCAA's future in his hands if his case is as strong as many of us believe it to be. Hopefully he looks at the big picture, but that may just be the fan within me who holds utter antipathy for the NCAA.
-
USC Outsider
- 5 stars Rating: 81
2262 votes total - (5667)
- 21 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
BlemBlam3 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 84
4097 votes total - (4411)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
AbsenteeTrojan said...
It doesn't take someone with bad character to accept a settlement worth millions of dollars.
I have no clue about his family situation, but the financial health of his personal life should be a priority far higher than receiving justice for USC.
And don't get me wrong, I would love for him to take this all the way to the end so that the NCAA gets what they deserve... but are you really saying that if McNair settles for something like $5,000,000, it reflects poorly on his character?
That type of money can make an individual (or family) financially secure for the rest of their lives if handled correctly.
IRONMIKE4SC
- 5 stars Rating: 84
1534 votes total - M&G Coordinator; Gnutt-Buster Extraordinaire; Posting Coach to those dumb enough to listen!
- (2624)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
brdcstr1 said...
I'm going to dream/hope/fantasize here a bit.
Wouldn't it be nice if a number of wealthy alums stepped up and offered to match the NCAA's buyout offer in the event Todd took the case to court and lost?
He would still have a guaranteed settlement, but far more important, he would have an opportunity to clear his name and regain his reputation. Not to mention the similar benefits it would hold for USC, the institution.
Maybe I'm being a bit unrealistic, but what is the price tag of someones reputation? If the record is sealed, the NCAA still controls the narrative and could blow it off as if it was cheaper to buy him out than go to court, since no one would know what the buyout figure was.
Todd would still have a dark cloud of suspicion hanging over his head, even though he would have a much fatter bank account.
In many ways, he holds the keys to the NCAA's future in his hands if his case is as strong as many of us believe it to be. Hopefully he looks at the big picture, but that may just be the fan within me who holds utter antipathy for the NCAA.
NcaaAssassinG13
- 4 stars Rating: 74
2258 votes total - (2350)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
IRONMIKE4SC said...
With McNairs character impuned by the NCAA, and his ability to coach in the collegiate ranks severely restricted by the same, an argument could be made that his career and future as a football coach was severely damaged... and his ability to earn 500K, up to a million a year, in either the collegiate or pro ranks was effectively kicked to the curb.
Would seem to me that settling for 5 Million, before taxes and attornes fees, would be extremely low. I would guess another digit needs to be added to that number.
AbsenteeTrojan
- 4 stars Rating: 73
407 votes total - (738)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
brdcstr1 said...
What you are saying is the NCAA conducted a lynching and chose someone whom you believe to be a scumbag to string up.
Two separate issues, but I'm grateful for the fact that the 'scumbag' has a venue in which he can punch the NCAA right back in the nose.
Reminds me of the bully who no longer has his big brother around for protection. He ain't so tough anymore, which is what I fully expect the NCAA's response to be.
BlemBlam3 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 84
4097 votes total - (4411)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
BlemBlam3 said...
This is amaazing The scumbag who was the lynchpin in USC even getting the harsh penalties in the first place, looks like he is going to come out smelling like a rose with a bag of money to boot.
All I want out of this is Paul Dee dead and broke
Is that too much to ask?
Road Scholar
OkieTrojanFan1
- 4 stars Rating: 77
454 votes total - (778)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ... | 6


Todd McNair v. NCAA Update -- Very Interesting News