Online Now 782

Fighton247 Board

The home for discussion on USC athletics

On this Board 365
Record: 3523 (11/24/2012)

Online now 767
Record: 4850 (6/6/2012)

Boards ▾

Fighton247 Board

The home for discussion on USC athletics

Off Topic Board

FightOn247 message board for off topic posts

Trojan News on the Net

Latest USC headlines from around the net

Reply

Todd McNair v. NCAA Update -- Very Interesting News

  • AbsenteeTrojan said...

    IronMike asked: "What could possibly be done to the NCAA if documents were destroyed, and this was subsequently discovered."

    I disagree that you say that not much will be done except hold the NCAA in contempt of court.

    FRCP 37(b)(2)(a)(i-vii) would control what happens if a party destroys documents in order to disobey a court order.

    The court could: - Direct that the claims made by McNair be taken as established for purposes of the action - Prohibit the NCAA from opposing McNair's claims or prohibit the NCAA from introducing certain evidence - Render a default against the NCAA and in favor of McNair

    Those are all pretty harsh penalties, and the NCAA definitely doesn't want to risk those.

    The only thing that the NCAA could really rely on to protect them (if they actually tried this) is FRCP 37(e), which deals with failure to provide electronically stored information. That statute states that a court cannot impose sanctions, but ONLY in the event that the documents were lost as the result of a routine, good-faith operation of their computer systems. There's no way that would work in this case, as investigators would disprove that claim in a heartbeat.

    AbsenteeTrojan:

    How's it going? I agree and paraphrased FRCP 37 in several of my responses, to include my response to IronMike when I said "doing so will almost ensure McNair's victory"...Deleting or withholding emails will be contempt of court and will cause more issues including fines and POSSIBLE jail time. The key piece and one of the most damaging is that Dees can not refuse to talk. Could try to plead the 5th but that is unlikely to be allowed unless he did something criminal. You can assert the 5th Amendment in civil proceedings, but, unlike in criminal proceedings, a jury can be told about it and can assume the statements would have been damaging.

    As this is not a criminal case again the damages will be limited to those you cited in FRCP 37. If there is a smoking gun the NCAA will settle before allowing either Dees to speak or the emails to be released.

    Beware, so long as you live, of judging men by their outward appearance. -- Jean de La Fontaine

    achindah

  • achindah said...

    AbsenteeTrojan:

    How's it going? I agree and paraphrased FRCP 37 in several of my responses, to include my response to IronMike when I said "doing so will almost ensure McNair's victory"...Deleting or withholding emails will be contempt of court and will cause more issues including fines and POSSIBLE jail time. The key piece and one of the most damaging is that Dees can not refuse to talk. Could try to plead the 5th but that is unlikely to be allowed unless he did something criminal. You can assert the 5th Amendment in civil proceedings, but, unlike in criminal proceedings, a jury can be told about it and can assume the statements would have been damaging.

    As this is not a criminal case again the damages will be limited to those you cited in FRCP 37. If there is a smoking gun the NCAA will settle before allowing either Dees to speak or the emails to be released.

    It's going well except for my impending copyrights final. Sorry about essay answer, but CivPro is still somewhat fresh in my mind and I'm obviously in finals mode.

    Looking back, I realize that you implied FRCP 37 when you wrote "doing so will almost ensure McNair's victory", but my reply wasn't a complete waste of time because now IronMike knows that if the NCAA did that, the court could essentially hand McNair the case with the methods I outlined.

    However, like you said... none of this is going to matter when the NCAA settles. Too bad, too. I'm curious to see what sort of lies were being spread around by the committee, etc.

    AbsenteeTrojan

  • AbsenteeTrojan said...

    It's going well except for my impending copyrights final. Sorry about essay answer, but CivPro is still somewhat fresh in my mind and I'm obviously in finals mode.

    Looking back, I realize that you implied FRCP 37 when you wrote "doing so will almost ensure McNair's victory", but my reply wasn't a complete waste of time because now IronMike knows that if the NCAA did that, the court could essentially hand McNair the case with the methods I outlined.

    However, like you said... none of this is going to matter when the NCAA settles. Too bad, too. I'm curious to see what sort of lies were being spread around by the committee, etc.

    Absentee Trojan:

    For those of us who are not lawyers (or in law school), your response was very insightful.

    Appreciate your help

    rkinslow

  • AbsenteeTrojan said...

    It's going well except for my impending copyrights final. Sorry about essay answer, but CivPro is still somewhat fresh in my mind and I'm obviously in finals mode.

    Looking back, I realize that you implied FRCP 37 when you wrote "doing so will almost ensure McNair's victory", but my reply wasn't a complete waste of time because now IronMike knows that if the NCAA did that, the court could essentially hand McNair the case with the methods I outlined.

    However, like you said... none of this is going to matter when the NCAA settles. Too bad, too. I'm curious to see what sort of lies were being spread around by the committee, etc.

    I understand where both of you are headed with this... But for the NCAA to "settle", McNair has to be willing to play along, and could be willing to hold out for A). Substantially more money; or B) some element of truth to come out.

    given that the integrity of the NCAA could be at stake, coupled with their well documented willingness to thumb their nose at government intervention, including not one, but two separate congressional oversight committees... I could easily envision a scenario where the NCAA may prefer to surrender to McNair (giving him every penny he's seeking), rather than risk exposure to the truth of the organizations capricious inner workings.

    Even in this scenario, the NCAAs approach would have to be exceptionally delicate, because McNairs advisors could choose not to play along if they get so much as a whiff that the NCAA is deftly afraid of certain damaging facts being publicly exposed.

    It would appear to me, based on the aggressive defense of NCAA emails, that this scenario may already be starting to play out in McNairs favor.

    This post was edited by IRONMIKE4SC on 5/6/2012 at 12:08 AM

    signature image

    .................... 47 Bowl Appearances - 11 National Championships - 7 Heisman Trophy Winners ..................

    IRONMIKE4SC

  • IronMike, that's all true. McNair may want justice served; he may see this all the way through to the end of a trial. However, you can never underestimate the power of a check handed to you with a number followed by six zeros: X,000,000.

    I can't see him turning that down.

    rkinslow: No problem. The analysis is a good exercise for me, lol. And it gets me away from studying for a few minutes.

    AbsenteeTrojan

  • AbsenteeTrojan said...

    It's going well except for my impending copyrights final. Sorry about essay answer, but CivPro is still somewhat fresh in my mind and I'm obviously in finals mode.

    Looking back, I realize that you implied FRCP 37 when you wrote "doing so will almost ensure McNair's victory", but my reply wasn't a complete waste of time because now IronMike knows that if the NCAA did that, the court could essentially hand McNair the case with the methods I outlined.

    However, like you said... none of this is going to matter when the NCAA settles. Too bad, too. I'm curious to see what sort of lies were being spread around by the committee, etc.

    No, it was not a waste of time at all and I truly welcomed your input. I just hope I wasn't brusque in my responses? So when is your copyrights final? Btw my apologies for responding so late; tonight's fight had me away from this site...lol

    Beware, so long as you live, of judging men by their outward appearance. -- Jean de La Fontaine

    achindah

  • achindah said...

    No, it was not a waste of time at all and I truly welcomed your input. I just hope I wasn't brusque in my responses? So when is your copyrights final? Btw my apologies for responding so late; tonight's fight had me away from this site...lol

    No, I didn't take your response the wrong way at all.

    My copyrights final is actually next Thursday, but I'm prepping for it now because I have a final on Monday, Tuesday, and Friday.

    AbsenteeTrojan

  • IRONMIKE4SC said...

    Out of curiosity, what is to prevent an agency such as the NCAA in this case, from producing only some of the mail, but not all... after carefully reviewing the documentation and ensuring there is no reference or telltale trail to some of the potentially more incriminating emails that might be conveniently omitted from their document production?

    Would seem to me that someone would have been hard at work mitigating this as a potential damaging issue for quite some time.

    I'm not an attorney, but i deal with attorneys and document production, and IMO , if the NCAA does not produce what they are supposed to, they will be in a world of hurt

    What is happiness? The feeling that power is growing, that resistance is overcome.--Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche

    scinsc5

  • AbsenteeTrojan said...

    IronMike, that's all true. McNair may want justice served; he may see this all the way through to the end of a trial. However, you can never underestimate the power of a check handed to you with a number followed by six zeros: X,000,000.

    I can't see him turning that down.

    This is what I am concerned about too. It's easy for us, who uniformly hate the NCAA, to want to try every way possible to overthrow it. But a person like McNair very well may see it as a chance to make big bucks, and if some of the not-so-flattering reports about McNair's character are true then I wouldn't be surprised if he chooses to do so.

    I hope I am wrong, but I do fear that this will be settled out of court.

    ArsenalTrojan

  • ArsenalTrojan said...

    This is what I am concerned about too. It's easy for us, who uniformly hate the NCAA, to want to try every way possible to overthrow it. But a person like McNair very well may see it as a chance to make big bucks, and if some of the not-so-flattering reports about McNair's character are true then I wouldn't be surprised if he chooses to do so.

    I hope I am wrong, but I do fear that this will be settled out of court.

    It doesn't take someone with bad character to accept a settlement worth millions of dollars.

    I have no clue about his family situation, but the financial health of his personal life should be a priority far higher than receiving justice for USC.

    And don't get me wrong, I would love for him to take this all the way to the end so that the NCAA gets what they deserve... but are you really saying that if McNair settles for something like $5,000,000, it reflects poorly on his character?

    That type of money can make an individual (or family) financially secure for the rest of their lives if handled correctly.

    AbsenteeTrojan

  • AbsenteeTrojan said...

    It doesn't take someone with bad character to accept a settlement worth millions of dollars.

    I have no clue about his family situation, but the financial health of his personal life should be a priority far higher than receiving justice for USC.

    And don't get me wrong, I would love for him to take this all the way to the end so that the NCAA gets what they deserve... but are you really saying that if McNair settles for something like $5,000,000, it reflects poorly on his character?

    That type of money can make an individual (or family) financially secure for the rest of their lives if handled correctly.

    I don't think accepting the settlement in itself reflects poorly on his character. I wouldn't blame him at all if that is what he chooses to do. But I do feel that someone with less character is more likely to accept the money rather than to fight the NCAA.

    Besides, wouldn't McNair receive a settlement anyway if he were to fight the NCAA and win?

    ArsenalTrojan

  • Yes, but if he goes to trial there is always a chance that he loses. If there is a 100% certainty that McNair will win, that case will never get to trial, it would be stupid for the NCAA to allow that. If it gets to trial, the NCAA still thinks they have a chance.

    AbsenteeTrojan

  • AbsenteeTrojan said...

    IronMike, that's all true. McNair may want justice served; he may see this all the way through to the end of a trial. However, you can never underestimate the power of a check handed to you with a number followed by six zeros: X,000,000.

    I can't see him turning that down.

    rkinslow: No problem. The analysis is a good exercise for me, lol. And it gets me away from studying for a few minutes.

    I'm going to dream/hope/fantasize here a bit.

    Wouldn't it be nice if a number of wealthy alums stepped up and offered to match the NCAA's buyout offer in the event Todd took the case to court and lost?

    He would still have a guaranteed settlement, but far more important, he would have an opportunity to clear his name and regain his reputation. Not to mention the similar benefits it would hold for USC, the institution.

    Maybe I'm being a bit unrealistic, but what is the price tag of someones reputation? If the record is sealed, the NCAA still controls the narrative and could blow it off as if it was cheaper to buy him out than go to court, since no one would know what the buyout figure was.

    Todd would still have a dark cloud of suspicion hanging over his head, even though he would have a much fatter bank account.

    In many ways, he holds the keys to the NCAA's future in his hands if his case is as strong as many of us believe it to be. Hopefully he looks at the big picture, but that may just be the fan within me who holds utter antipathy for the NCAA.

    brdcstr1

  • brdcstr1 said...

    I'm going to dream/hope/fantasize here a bit.

    Wouldn't it be nice if a number of wealthy alums stepped up and offered to match the NCAA's buyout offer in the event Todd took the case to court and lost?

    He would still have a guaranteed settlement, but far more important, he would have an opportunity to clear his name and regain his reputation. Not to mention the similar benefits it would hold for USC, the institution.

    Maybe I'm being a bit unrealistic, but what is the price tag of someones reputation? If the record is sealed, the NCAA still controls the narrative and could blow it off as if it was cheaper to buy him out than go to court, since no one would know what the buyout figure was.

    Todd would still have a dark cloud of suspicion hanging over his head, even though he would have a much fatter bank account.

    In many ways, he holds the keys to the NCAA's future in his hands if his case is as strong as many of us believe it to be. Hopefully he looks at the big picture, but that may just be the fan within me who holds utter antipathy for the NCAA.

    I love that idea.

    USC: Financing Justice

    I'm in.

    rkinslow

  • Destruction of evidence is risky business ... as we see with so many individuals caught in the baseball juicing investigations, the truth will keep the Feds out of the investigation a lie or cover-up brings the Feds in and that is a lot of fire power to go up against.
    The NCAA is better off releasing all documentation and letting a few heads roll than bringing in a Federal investigation for tampering with evidence.
    If Paul Dees tells one lie in his testimony to the committee asking him questions regarding the Reggie Bush investigation he will be a Roger Clemens story.
    Pat Haden played this brilliantly and I am sure that Todd has the support of USC backers donating to his legal costs as well as some of the legal minds of USC. This will be played out in the legal system where it belongs. This does not help USC right now, but it will get Todd a just settlement, clear his name and USC in the process.
    I hope Todd takes it all the way and does not settle out of court.

    signature image

    USC Outsider

  • This is amaazing
    The scumbag who was the lynchpin in USC even getting the harsh penalties in the first place, looks like he is going to come out smelling like a rose with a bag of money to boot.

    All I want out of this is Paul Dee dead and broke

    Is that too much to ask?

    BlemBlam3

  • What type of offer would McNair be looking at? Why not refuse to settle until the emails and Dee is deposed, couldn't he increase his settlement, and wouldn't that be the best revenge?

    BigLouie

  • BlemBlam3 said...

    The scumbag who was the lynchpin in USC even getting the harsh penalties in the first place, looks like he is going to come out smelling like a rose with a bag of money to boot.

    What you are saying is the NCAA conducted a lynching and chose someone whom you believe to be a scumbag to string up.

    Two separate issues, but I'm grateful for the fact that the 'scumbag' has a venue in which he can punch the NCAA right back in the nose.

    Reminds me of the bully who no longer has his big brother around for protection. He ain't so tough anymore, which is what I fully expect the NCAA's response to be.

    brdcstr1

  • BigLouie said...

    What type of offer would McNair be looking at? Why not refuse to settle until the emails and Dee is deposed, couldn't he increase his settlement, and wouldn't that be the best revenge?

    At least seven figures, with the amount of figures to the left of the decimal point to be determined.

    Even though I'm not a lawyer, I would be really surprised to see this thing settled before Paul Dee is deposed. Leverage is power, and McNair's lawyers don't have the leverage today they would hold the day after they have all of the information required to go to trial.

    brdcstr1

  • AbsenteeTrojan said...

    It doesn't take someone with bad character to accept a settlement worth millions of dollars.

    I have no clue about his family situation, but the financial health of his personal life should be a priority far higher than receiving justice for USC.

    And don't get me wrong, I would love for him to take this all the way to the end so that the NCAA gets what they deserve... but are you really saying that if McNair settles for something like $5,000,000, it reflects poorly on his character?

    That type of money can make an individual (or family) financially secure for the rest of their lives if handled correctly.

    With McNairs character impuned by the NCAA, and his ability to coach in the collegiate ranks severely restricted by the same, an argument could be made that his career and future as a football coach was severely damaged... and his ability to earn 500K, up to a million a year, in either the collegiate or pro ranks was effectively kicked to the curb.

    Would seem to me that settling for 5 Million, before taxes and attornes fees, would be extremely low. I would guess another digit needs to be added to that number.

    signature image

    .................... 47 Bowl Appearances - 11 National Championships - 7 Heisman Trophy Winners ..................

    IRONMIKE4SC

  • brdcstr1 said...

    I'm going to dream/hope/fantasize here a bit.

    Wouldn't it be nice if a number of wealthy alums stepped up and offered to match the NCAA's buyout offer in the event Todd took the case to court and lost?

    He would still have a guaranteed settlement, but far more important, he would have an opportunity to clear his name and regain his reputation. Not to mention the similar benefits it would hold for USC, the institution.

    Maybe I'm being a bit unrealistic, but what is the price tag of someones reputation? If the record is sealed, the NCAA still controls the narrative and could blow it off as if it was cheaper to buy him out than go to court, since no one would know what the buyout figure was.

    Todd would still have a dark cloud of suspicion hanging over his head, even though he would have a much fatter bank account.

    In many ways, he holds the keys to the NCAA's future in his hands if his case is as strong as many of us believe it to be. Hopefully he looks at the big picture, but that may just be the fan within me who holds utter antipathy for the NCAA.


    I was thinking the same thing Brdcstr- you beat me to it.
    Sure would be nice for this to go all the way, then all the nzaa's dirty laundry would be exposed.

    Of course, those fair minded folks at the Nzaa will be eager to turn over their emails and all that stuff, so they can prove they had no hidden agenda. They having nothing to hide, I'm sure of it!
    I'm sure they are more than willing to cooperate and demonstrate the cooperative principle they require of schools they investigate. They should be eager to prove their innocence.
    sarcasm

    Speaking of scumbags (mentioned in a few previous posts)
    I had a Walter Byers like moment (the former Nzaa Fuhrer- who coined the phrase "student-athlete")
    the other day and came up with a catchy little slogan for all Nzaa employees that flows just like
    "student-athlete".

    Assassin Policy Manual Update:
    The proper way to address or refer to any
    Nzaa employee shall be:

    "scumbag-employee"

    If said (scumbag-employee) has some fancy little title, then greet them appropriately.
    For example: "Have a seat over here Mr. (scumbag-chairman),
    but don't break my chair again, you fat-bodied scat lover."

    NcaaAssassinG13

  • IRONMIKE4SC said...

    With McNairs character impuned by the NCAA, and his ability to coach in the collegiate ranks severely restricted by the same, an argument could be made that his career and future as a football coach was severely damaged... and his ability to earn 500K, up to a million a year, in either the collegiate or pro ranks was effectively kicked to the curb.

    Would seem to me that settling for 5 Million, before taxes and attornes fees, would be extremely low. I would guess another digit needs to be added to that number.

    MrNair's reputation was only damaged for the period that he had a show-cause slapped on him, plus whatever continuing damage you could claim because of the stigma attached to that. However, he would've been able to get another job in CFB at some point. There's no doubt in my mind about that. So you can't claim lifetime damages.

    The other thing is if the NCAA offers to settle the matter for $5m, they could also offer to release a public statement that would remove some of the stigma from McNair. This also gets McNair back to doing what (I assume) he enjoys - coaching football.

    AbsenteeTrojan

  • brdcstr1 said...

    What you are saying is the NCAA conducted a lynching and chose someone whom you believe to be a scumbag to string up.

    Two separate issues, but I'm grateful for the fact that the 'scumbag' has a venue in which he can punch the NCAA right back in the nose.

    Reminds me of the bully who no longer has his big brother around for protection. He ain't so tough anymore, which is what I fully expect the NCAA's response to be.

    You don't understand the meaning of the word Lynchpin?

    Basically my point was that the NCAA used McNair's relationship with Reggie Bush as a way to "Prove" that USC (McNair) either knew or should have known that RB had a relationship with Lake that was suspicious.

    If Todd McNair wasn't running around as part of Reggie's posse, the NCAA had no link, or lynchpin to hold their feeble case together.

    And I guess you will have to trust me on whether he is a scumbag or not.

    The biggest mistake Pete Carroll made was hiring that man. And he was warned, by numerous people not to do it.

    He jusy developed a blind spot when it came to McNair. We could have gotten 100 oeoole to do that job, who would have done it better, and not gotten us in trouble.

    And that isn't my opinion alone. That is a direct quote from another former NFL coach, off the record

    BlemBlam3

  • I would be shocked if the NCAA didn't settle and fully expect them to write McNair a check for 8 digits. It's not like it is their own personal money, they keep the skeletons in the closet, and they all keep their cushy jobs in Indy.

    TommyE

  • BlemBlam3 said...

    This is amaazing The scumbag who was the lynchpin in USC even getting the harsh penalties in the first place, looks like he is going to come out smelling like a rose with a bag of money to boot.

    All I want out of this is Paul Dee dead and broke

    Is that too much to ask?

    Based on what's out there regarding Fat Bastard's health, the former will happen before the latter.

    What a shame - potentially Schadenfreude at its finest. At least there's still Potuto and Conboy.

    Road Scholar

    OkieTrojanFan1