Online Now 604

Fighton247 Board

The home for discussion on USC athletics

On this Board 328
Record: 3523 (11/24/2012)

Online now 640
Record: 4850 (6/6/2012)

Boards ▾

Fighton247 Board

The home for discussion on USC athletics

Off Topic Board

FightOn247 message board for off topic posts

Trojan News on the Net

Latest USC headlines from around the net

Reply

Oregon's Staying Power

  • I just can't stand the Ducks..especially just their fans. I honestly think we hold a lot of advantages over these guys, but I was wondering do you think they have staying power? And I don't mean in the next 10 years.. I'm talking the next 20-30.

    dpm1129

  • As long as Phil Knight is alive, yes

    http://www.jackthreads.com/invite/sdotk sign up! (please & fight on!)

    SdotK

  • That's what I was afraid of lol. I guess the one thing they have against them is they still don't reel in the top recruits.. which is kind of surprising

    dpm1129

  • dpm1129 said...

    I just can't stand the Ducks..especially just their fans. I honestly think we hold a lot of advantages over these guys, but I was wondering do you think they have staying power? And I don't mean in the next 10 years.. I'm talking the next 20-30.

    Chip=Oregon. As long as they have him, they'll be competitive.

    The facilities and big dollars haven't done much for Okie State since T Boone Pickens started pumping money into the facilities.

    At the end of the day, recruits still have to decide if they want to live in Ewegene and Stoolwater to take advantage of the facilities.

    brdcstr1

  • brdcstr1 said...

    Chip=Oregon. As long as they have him, they'll be competitive.

    The facilities and big dollars haven't done much for Okie State since T Boone Pickens started pumping money into the facilities.

    At the end of the day, recruits still have to decide if they want to live in Ewegene and Stoolwater to take advantage of the facilities.

    I don't think Chip will stay much longer. This flirtation was just the beginning if the NFL keeps calling, the circumstances will finally arrive for him to make the jump. I think it's just too appealing for him..kind of like with what happened with Pete.

    dpm1129

  • It's not hard to convince kids to live in Eugene. Not all the "big time recruits" grow up in large cities or want to live in one. There's certainly pros and cons about both.

    ralfn8tr20

  • ralfn8tr20 said...

    It's not hard to convince kids to live in Eugene. Not all the "big time recruits" grow up in large cities or want to live in one. There's certainly pros and cons about both.

    Agree. But Chips unorthodox scheme Is what's been giving them the advantage, as opposed to better players or superior facilities.

    brdcstr1

  • dpm1129 said...

    That's what I was afraid of lol. I guess the one thing they have against them is they still don't reel in the top recruits.. which is kind of surprising

    Chipper looks for kids that automatically come with speed, as much speed as he can find and adapts them into a system or position that will fit their size. That is all good but as you can see if you start matching speed with speed with kids that IMO have more athleticism, and not just raw speed with a mediocre or in need of development you can see the results. It becomes the equalizer and the athleticism starts to shine through. As teams catch up to the speed it will be only a matter of time and the jump to another conference or NFL will be inevitable.

    SCWARTM

  • brdcstr1 said...

    Chip=Oregon. As long as they have him, they'll be competitive.

    The facilities and big dollars haven't done much for Okie State since T Boone Pickens started pumping money into the facilities.

    At the end of the day, recruits still have to decide if they want to live in Ewegene and Stoolwater to take advantage of the facilities.

    It is all relative to their pasts, Okie St just completed their 4th straight 9+ win season.

    westcoastfball

  • I'm old enough to have seen several PAC teams flow in and out of dominance in the conference. Only USC has always come back....and that is reflected in the number of USC conference championships vs everyone else.

    The quacks are a long way from proving they're even in the discussion.

    signature image

    "Here are provided seats of meditative joy, where shall rise again the destined reign of Troy." Virgil

    usctrojan1

  • dpm1129 said...

    I just can't stand the Ducks..especially just their fans. I honestly think we hold a lot of advantages over these guys, but I was wondering do you think they have staying power? And I don't mean in the next 10 years.. I'm talking the next 20-30.

    No.

    Assuming that Float U gets hit with sanctions, and yes float fan, sanctions are a coming...they will "fade" back into their life-destined role of mediocrity. Do you think Float U could survive the penalties that were handed down to USC? I don't.

    When SC's penalties were announced we actually saw an exodous of players from the team, not to mention recruits change their mind. Do you think Float U can survive that kind of challenge? I don't.

    Once you take away the Vegas Showgirl uniforms, all you're left with is Porky Kelly, Phil Knight, and not much more.

    signature image

    TrojanWarrior1

  • Losing a close game to Auburn was pinnacle of that program. Well that and getting to wear those stupid "12-0" shirts.

    Joe_Jitsu

  • Great. Another Oregon thread. Just what we needed on this board. Thanks OP!

    TLK cool

    signature image

    The Lizard King

  • usctrojan1 said...

    I'm old enough to have seen several PAC teams flow in and out of dominance in the conference. Only USC has always come back....and that is reflected in the number of USC conference championships vs everyone else.

    The quacks are a long way from proving they're even in the discussion.

    Most of the Pac-12 teams have never had a period of dominance, USC, Washington, UCLA, and now Oregon. Clearly if Washington wants to move forward they need to start beating Oregon. Only USC has had a better 3 year run in the Pac 10/12 Conference (2 or less conference losses in 3 years).

    westcoastfball

  • Sometimes I think the Phil Knight stuff is overblown. I mean having him and his Nike backing definitely helps, but I don't see Maryland becoming a dominant program just because the Under Armour is a fan. The Phil Knight stuff is big, but I see Oregon as one of those trendy teams. Kind of like Colorado in the 90s. I a little too young to think of some other names. Once Chipper leaves, Oregon will definitely take a step or two back. Do you guys really expect strong sanctions? I thought they weren't expected to be that bad.. which is total BS, but that's probably convo for a different thread.

    dpm1129

  • westcoastfball said...

    Most of the Pac-12 teams have never had a period of dominance, USC, Washington, UCLA, and now Oregon. Clearly if Washington wants to move forward they need to start beating Oregon. Only USC has had a better 3 year run in the Pac 10/12 Conference (2 or less conference losses in 3 years).

    Washington does have a great history of winning. They have never established themselves as a national elite, but they have historically done better than any of the other teams mentioned...especially Oregon.

    They also have a decent in-state population with significant wealth...both of which are crucial.

    signature image

    Nickell Robey Fan Club Member "Coach, I don't mean any disrespect, but I want you to know I never get tired." -- Morgan Breslin

    TrojanEconomist

  • TrojanEconomist said...

    Washington does have a great history of winning. They have never established themselves as a national elite, but they have historically done better than any of the other teams mentioned...especially Oregon.

    They also have a decent in-state population with significant wealth...both of which are crucial.

    Historically yes, but kids coming out of high school weren't even born when Don James coached there. Oregon has totally dominated the northwest the last 10 years. Can it be reversed? Sure, but I doubt it will be because of a few good seasons 20+ years ago.

    westcoastfball

  • Anyone who believes OR is a flash in the pan team must be new to college football and or a new USC bandwagoner. OR has been successful for over a decade. Successful not maybe by the lofty standards of USC's heritage, but definitely by the standards of the rest of the PAC.

    Also, I believe people give Chip too much credit. OR had been on the rise due to Bellotti's tutelage and Chip inherited his recruits and took it to the next level. OR would survive the loss of Kelly just fine. However, I do agree that IF OR were to receive stiff sanctions they could not bounce back like USC has. No one in the PAC, and not many in the whole country, enjoys the inherent attractiveness for recruits like USC. SoCal sun and fun coupled with a hugely successful past in CFB will always make USC a top recruit destination. It's for these reasons alone that USC has so easily survived the BS sanctions they received.

    As far as OR impending sanctions, no one knows what is going to happen. What i do know is OR still has not received a Notice of Allegations - which is strange because by NCAA protocol I believe they are over due. It's believed they will get a slap on the wrist because they operated in a gray area instead of in a black and white one. A gray area that will be closed or has already in recent NCAA changes. So far it hasn't negatively affected recruiting which could be indicative of what OR is expecting, but again no one knows for sure.

    On the last point, what OR can really boast about is the level of success they have achieved with less than stellar recruiting rankings. If OR could field a USC type Defense coupled with their standard video game like Offense, they would be a dynasty. But low and behold they have not been able to recruit more than a couple great defensive players a year.

    I foresee USC and OR battling it out for the next few years minimum.

    Quack Addict

  • TrojanWarrior1 said...

    Do you think Float U could survive the penalties that were handed down to USC? I don't.

    I just don't see the NCAA hitting anyone with the same penalties as USC received. Could Float U handle a one year bowl ban and 3 schollies a year for 3 years? I think they could.

    "there is the SEC, and then there is USC." - Marcus Allen, 11-26-11

    lafromla1

  • As long as Oregon has an elite coach, the Ducks will have an elite program. It's really that simple. Oregon had a good program from 2000-2008, and has been elite 2009-2011 (and likely 2012 and 2013). the difference has been Chip Kelly. If Chip stays a long time or if the ducks hire a great replacement, I think Oregon continues to be a formidable program. I don't think Oregon gets harsh sanctions either.

    mb2trojan

  • mb2trojan said...

    As long as Oregon has an elite coach, the Ducks will have an elite program. It's really that simple. Oregon had a good program from 2000-2008, and has been elite 2009-2011 (and likely 2012 and 2013). the difference has been Chip Kelly. If Chip stays a long time or if the ducks hire a great replacement, I think Oregon continues to be a formidable program. I don't think Oregon gets harsh sanctions either.

    From 2000-2008 they were still the 2nd best program in the conference.

    westcoastfball

  • westcoastfball said...

    From 2000-2008 they were still the 2nd best program in the conference.

    Debateable.

    signature image

    TrojanWarrior1

  • lafromla1 said...

    I just don't see the NCAA hitting anyone with the same penalties as USC received. Could Float U handle a one year bowl ban and 3 schollies a year for 3 years? I think they could.

    Well, if we take Emmert and his mafia at their word, I disagree.

    A 1-year bowl ban for Float U and schollie limitations would definitely drain the pond juice from their program. Look at their recruiting now without any limits...besides a RB commit, their class sucks.

    signature image

    TrojanWarrior1

  • TrojanWarrior1 said...

    Debateable.

    With who?

    They were 42 games over .500.
    4 10+win seasons.

    westcoastfball

  • westcoastfball said...

    From 2000-2008 they were still the 2nd best program in the conference.

    I agree, but they were not elite during that time frame. Under my ranking system, I have them 12th nationally from 2000-2008 and 2nd best in the conference (ore st 3rd and 17th overall). 77 wins over the frame...t16th nationally. 15th best SOS (sagarin). T13th most wins over top 30 teams (final sagarin). Definitely a good program then....but ducks took huge step up 2009-2011. Stepped up to elite.

    mb2trojan