Online Now 2109

Fighton247 Board

The home for discussion on USC athletics

On this Board 591
Record: 3523 (11/24/2012)

Online now 1061
Record: 4850 (6/6/2012)

Boards ▾

Fighton247 Board

The home for discussion on USC athletics

Off Topic Board

FightOn247 message board for off topic posts

Trojan News on the Net

Latest USC headlines from around the net

Reply

I like your board......

  • SC is one of three FBS schools to have NEVER played an FCS opponent; fUCLA and ND being the other two. Washington would have been on that list had they not scheduled Eastern Washington last season.

    Also came across this site when I was digging around (note: it is FBS vs FCS records prior to the 2011 season):

    http://sportsdelve.wordpress.com/2011/08/12/a-complete-record-of-fbs-i-a-vs-fcs-i-aa/

    JCakus

  • usctrojan1 said...

    lol No kidding. I think a big misconception out here is the whole "SEC! SEC! SEC!" thing.....y'all really hate each other..with a passion - you just join together vs "outsiders".

    I've heard some hair-raising things directly from SEC fans in the South about the back door back stabbing and hate among the programs...and they certainly didn't try to hide it. I would say, SEC hate between y'all is greater than anything we experience out here. Coach Riley of Oregon State made reference to that in an interview when the USC sanctions were first announced. He played in the SEC - Alabama, I believe.

    He was an ALL-SEC DB for Coach Bryant.

    I think a lot of everything gets overblown on tBB as you know. I don't experience the hate near as much when traveling to other schools. The rivalries though can be hateful at times. I think cheering for the conference is just a Southern thing. I don't know why, but people want their neighbors to do well as it represents positively on them. I am not quite sure why other conferences don't do the same, especially the ones that have been around have the same base of teams like the SEC, B1G, and PAC12.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "Don't confuse association, with something we both really like." ---JB

    BetterOff

  • TrojanWarrior1 said...

    Go back and reread the post and learn what "context" means.

    "Aren't you tired of watching your conference ilk play meaningless OOC games and then bust out the ol', "well we play in the SEC blah blah blah" doctrine that you all seem to memorize like your favorite Bible verse?"

    "But don't ever "Bible verse" me again.

    Not my schtick."

    "The 3 most important things in the south...
    God, Football, and Family. Mix up the order anyway you like."

    "So God is third on your list?"

    The context is you inviting him to personalize it. Don't talk down to me like I'm an idiot. I've got nothing against you, I just like objectivity, and want people to feel invited here.

    Spartrojan

  • I definitely root for the Pac-12 to do well during the season and especially during the bowls (except for fUCLA, that is...). If the Pac-12 were to go 36-0 (unlikely, I know) in their OOC slate, then it helps the voter's perceptions that the conference is strong. Until a playoff system is in place, CFB is still a beauty pageant.

    I think Larry Scott may have set back the Pac-12 with his proclamation that all neutral site games be covered by the Pac-12 Network. If we can't get the SEC to do more home-and-home's then neutral site games are the way to go, but it looks like those may be going away now....

    JCakus

  • JCakus said...

    I definitely root for the Pac-12 to do well during the season and especially during the bowls (except for fUCLA, that is...). If the Pac-12 were to go 36-0 (unlikely, I know) in their OOC slate, then it helps the voter's perceptions that the conference is strong. Until a playoff system is in place, CFB is still a beauty pageant.

    I think Larry Scott may have set back the Pac-12 with his proclamation that all neutral site games be covered by the Pac-12 Network. If we can't get the SEC to do more home-and-home's then neutral site games are the way to go, but it looks like those may be going away now....

    Why did he do that.

    I love the neutral site games. Tickets split 50/50 and they have a great atmosphere.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "Don't confuse association, with something we both really like." ---JB

    BetterOff

  • Spartrojan said...

    "Aren't you tired of watching your conference ilk play meaningless OOC games and then bust out the ol', "well we play in the SEC blah blah blah" doctrine that you all seem to memorize like your favorite Bible verse?"

    "But don't ever "Bible verse" me again.

    Not my schtick."

    "The 3 most important things in the south... God, Football, and Family. Mix up the order anyway you like."

    "So God is third on your list?"

    The context is you inviting him to personalize it. Don't talk down to me like I'm an idiot. I've got nothing against you, I just like objectivity, and want people to feel invited here.

    The context, Jr., is that you need to get down to the South and you'll get it. This is not some stereotype that I pulled out of my ass. Bear Bryant would agree my comment as well.

    signature image

    TrojanWarrior1

  • BetterOff said...

    This is very true.

    If you take the 10 best teams in football last year, both the PAC12 and the SEC had 3 each. Bama, LSU, Arkansas, Oregon, USC, and Stanford.

    The SEC benefits from showing up big in big games, namely the BCSCG's lately and the bowl games which to some don't matter, but when people are debating the SEC/Big12 and Arkansas (who both LSU and Bama beat by more than 3 TDS) beats Kansas St it means something. When you look at the #4 team in the SEC West in 2010 (Bama) beating the co-champion from the B1G 49-7, people notice.

    I would love to see parody among all the conferences and to get to a playoff system. I know things worked out for us last year and did so for you guys in 2004, but I would love to see the questioning ended on the field. I do think that SC team was the best team in 2004, but I do think Auburn was better than OU.

    We just need to get to a playoff and I would honestly rather it be 8 teams instead of 4. I know 4 takes some of the debate out, but if you want the best, 8 would open the door to a team like Boise or TCU in previous years and give them a chance.

    I think that Oklahoma team was a much better team than the one that played that night in the NC game. The Trojans went into that game with a massive chip on their shoulders, and something to prove. Auburns poor schedule did them in, that's the way it goes.

    I've heard the argument from Auburn fans regarding the shared opponent - VTech. USC beat them in the first game of the season 24-13, while Auburn beat them 16-13 at the end of the year. What is always failed to mention is...USC was fielding a brand new, inexperienced offensive line the beginning of the 2004 season, with first time starters. Leinart and Fred Matua were the only starters returning on offense, the coaches had to pull a RT to protect Matt's blind side, out of the JC ranks. The RBs were starting for the first time, so were the WRs. It takes a while for an offensive line to gel, we definitely went into that first game with a ton of questions on the line. Auburn had a veteran team, with a lot of playmakers...I would have loved to see what the score would have been if USC played V-Tech at the end of the season.

    This post was edited by usctrojan1 on 4/9/2012 at 12:50 PM

    signature image

    "Here are provided seats of meditative joy, where shall rise again the destined reign of Troy." Virgil

    usctrojan1

  • From the Pac-12:

    "No member institution shall enter into an agreement to play a neutral-site football game (except in circumstances where such neutral-site game is the away leg of a home-and-home series) unless such agreement provides the Conference with the exclusive broadcast rights and digital rights in all media, and copyright to such neutral-site game."

    http://www.pacifictakes.com/2012/2/7/2781926/pac-12-revisits-neutral-site-games-works-them-to-their-advantage

    Simple answer, is more money for the Pac-12...
    I don't like it either. Okay, so most of the neutral venues are not in the West, but I would rather play a huge "neutral" site game against another good Big 6 school, then open at home vs. Hawaii...

    JCakus

  • phear_SC said...

    How many FCS schools has USC played ... ever ....?

    ZERO

    who cares? san jose st is not as good as appalachain st or northen alabama

    What is happiness? The feeling that power is growing, that resistance is overcome.--Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche

    scinsc5

  • usctrojan1 said...

    I think that Oklahoma team was a much better team than the one that played that night in the NC game. The Trojans went into that game with a massive chip on their shoulders, and something to prove. Auburns poor schedule did them in, that's the way it goes.

    I've heard the argument from Auburn fans regarding the shared opponent - VTech. USC beat them in the first game of the season 24-13, while Auburn beat them 16-13 at the end of the year. What is always failed to mention is...USC was fielding a brand new, inexperienced offensive line the beginning of the 2004 season, with first time starters. Leinart and Fred Matua were the only starters returning on offense, the coaches had to pull a RT to protect Matt's blind side, out of the JC ranks. The RBs were starting for the first time, so were the WRs. It takes a while for an offensive line to gel, we definitely went into that first game with a ton of questions on the line. Auburn had a veteran team, with a lot of playmakers...I would have loved to see what the score would have been if USC played V-Tech at the end of the season.

    I don't even really look at the VaTech game either way. It was an early game for you guys and a game that Auburn didn't want to be in at the end of the season.

    I just look at it from a talent standpoint and what certain players accomplished in the NFL and where they went in the draft.

    I think that many people have given the Big12 a pass in many years when they pointed to finger at other conferences for being "weak".

    How many times was the OU/Texas game the only game that mattered in that conference over the last decade?

    signature image signature image signature image

    "Don't confuse association, with something we both really like." ---JB

    BetterOff

  • BetterOff said...

    He was an ALL-SEC DB for Coach Bryant.

    I think a lot of everything gets overblown on tBB as you know. I don't experience the hate near as much when traveling to other schools. The rivalries though can be hateful at times. I think cheering for the conference is just a Southern thing. I don't know why, but people want their neighbors to do well as it represents positively on them. I am not quite sure why other conferences don't do the same, especially the ones that have been around have the same base of teams like the SEC, B1G, and PAC12.

    I'm going to say this, I hope it comes out right, because there is zero disrespect.

    The PAC-12 is extremely competitive, in all sports, but the California schools extend that rivalry to every aspect universities can compete. Academics, location, quality of students and GPAs, the Song Girls, everything you can compete in..not just football. We have a tremendous number of great athletes in California, not all of them dream of being football players - that fact is reflected in the number of NCAA championships won by PAC-12 teams - ranked #1, 2 and 3 in the country. We compete with two of the top public academic universities in the country, plus an elite private university that excels in all round athletics. Competing against that makes us value our independence from each other, and strive harder to outdo each other, in spectacular pissing contests, lol.

    We're not defined by football - we're highly competitive in every-freakin-thing!

    signature image

    "Here are provided seats of meditative joy, where shall rise again the destined reign of Troy." Virgil

    usctrojan1

  • TrojanWarrior1 said...

    The context, Jr., is that you need to get down to the South and you'll get it. This is not some stereotype that I pulled out of my ass. Bear Bryant would agree my comment as well.

    Really, enough of the talking down to me. That is actually NOT what the context is here, so I'd suggest you whip out a dictionary before trying to school someone on the definition of a word again. Do a google search. Something. No one is disagreeing that is the general theme in the South, I said so myself, just a few posts back. I have been to the South, my dad is FROM the South. I outlined the context from the argument, and it's all readily available for you to read again in it's original form if you click back to the first page of this thread and read from there.

    I don't want to get into an argument on the internet, especially with someone who isn't willing to admit when they are wrong and instead resorts to ad hominem attacks. Please either bring some new insight to this, show me something I missed, or drop it.

    This post was edited by Spartrojan on 4/9/2012 at 1:02 PM

    Spartrojan

  • scinsc5 said...

    who cares? san jose st is not as good as appalachain st or northen alabama

    UNA is Div II. I would bet that most years, San Jose St would crush them.

    Yes, there are very good FCS teams that could beat 30 or 40% of the FBS teams. I agree with that, but no in a big way to UNA. They just happened to have 3 or 4 good FBS transfers, but they still couldn't win the Div II title any of those years.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "Don't confuse association, with something we both really like." ---JB

    BetterOff

  • usctrojan1 said...

    I'm going to say this, I hope it comes out right, because there is zero disrespect.

    The PAC-12 is extremely competitive, in all sports, but the California schools extend that rivalry to every aspect universities can compete. Academics, location, quality of students and GPAs, the Song Girls, everything you can compete in..not just football. We have a tremendous number of great athletes in California, not all of them dream of being football players - that fact is reflected in the number of NCAA championships won by PAC-12 teams - ranked #1, 2 and 3 in the country. We compete with two of the top public academic universities in the country, plus an elite private university that excels in all round athletics. Competing against that makes us value our independence from each other, and strive harder to outdo each other, in spectacular pissing contests, lol.

    We're not defined by football - we're highly competitive in every-freakin-thing!

    While no one is going to argue the SEC is superior in academics to the PAC-12, there are some, hmm, less highly thought of? schools in the PAC-12, while the SEC has it's share of great institutions in Vanderbilt, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, and now TAMU and Mizzou. I'm probably missing one or two as well.

    Spartrojan

  • We play Cal every year, and if you look at the talent that comes out of that place (DeSean, Aaron Rodgers, etc) and does very well in the NFL, one would wonder why they ever lost a college game. We both know that the college vs NFL comparison just doesn't work. USC is the top dog in talent sent to the NFL...just look at the numbers of players drafted, and the fact that USC has given the NFL more Pro HOFers than any other university.

    signature image

    "Here are provided seats of meditative joy, where shall rise again the destined reign of Troy." Virgil

    usctrojan1

  • Spartrojan said...

    While no one is going to argue the SEC is superior in academics to the PAC-12, there are some, hmm, less highly thought of? schools in the PAC-12, while the SEC has it's share of great institutions in Vanderbilt, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, and now TAMU and Mizzou. I'm probably missing one or two as well.

    I'm speaking of the California schools...thought I made that clear..sorry!

    signature image

    "Here are provided seats of meditative joy, where shall rise again the destined reign of Troy." Virgil

    usctrojan1

  • Spartrojan said...

    Really, enough of the talking down to me. That is actually NOT what the context is here, so I'd suggest you whip out a dictionary before trying to school someone on the definition of a word again. Do a google search. Something. No one is disagreeing that is the general theme in the South, I said so myself, just a few posts back. I have been to the South, my dad is FROM the South. I outlined the context from the argument, and it's all readily available for you to read again in it's original form if you click back to the first page of this thread and read from there.

    I don't want to get into an argument on the internet, especially with someone who isn't willing to admit when they are wrong and instead resorts to ad hominem attacks. Please either bring some new insight to this, show me something I missed, or drop it.

    Find the ignore button, Jr. And that WAS the context.

    signature image

    TrojanWarrior1

  • usctrojan1 said...

    I'm going to say this, I hope it comes out right, because there is zero disrespect.

    The PAC-12 is extremely competitive, in all sports, but the California schools extend that rivalry to every aspect universities can compete. Academics, location, quality of students and GPAs, the Song Girls, everything you can compete in..not just football. We have a tremendous number of great athletes in California, not all of them dream of being football players - that fact is reflected in the number of NCAA championships won by PAC-12 teams - ranked #1, 2 and 3 in the country. We compete with two of the top public academic universities in the country, plus an elite private university that excels in all round athletics. Competing against that makes us value our independence from each other, and strive harder to outdo each other, in spectacular pissing contests, lol.

    We're not defined by football - we're highly competitive in every-freakin-thing!

    I think you will find that true in a lot of places. California as a state is different with its size and that it can support many major Universities.

    To the sports angle.

    When you look down the list of other sports, USC is very high in a lot of them. The PAC12 and SEC are closer to each other in the "Olympic" and spring sports than most conferences, along with schools in Texas based on weather to some degree.

    Look at baseball, softball, gymnastics, swimming/diving, golf, track and field/cross country and tennis and you will find schools from both littering the rankings.

    You won't find many more heated rivalries better than Alabama/Georgia Gymnastics. It is hard to imagine gymnastics getting ugly, but does between the two. lol

    When you look at the CWS for baseball, you'll usually find 3 SEC/southern ACC schools, 2 Texas schools, 2 PAC12 schools, and a team like Pepperdine (most beautiful campus in the nation as well) or someone of that nature.

    The same in softball.....3 SEC schools, 3 PAC 12 schools, and 2 Texas schools.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "Don't confuse association, with something we both really like." ---JB

    BetterOff

  • Spartrojan said...

    While no one is going to argue the SEC is superior in academics to the PAC-12, there are some, hmm, less highly thought of? schools in the PAC-12, while the SEC has it's share of great institutions in Vanderbilt, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, and now TAMU and Mizzou. I'm probably missing one or two as well.

    Vandy, Florida, Georgia, Texas A&M, Alabama, Auburn, and Missouri are the schools listed by US News in the top 100, in that order.

    The issue with academics is that 6 of the now 14 SEC schools were founded as land grant Universities. They were supposed to only support citizens of the state and were founded as an alternative to the other schools as affordable locations (if tuition reached "X" amount, they would lose their funding) to further one's education in more specialized areas. Since the 60's or so, the trend has changed with the needs of the population and these schools have attempted to become more well-rounded and for that lack of a better wording, better schools. Those are Arkansas, Auburn, LSU, Kentucky, Mississippi St, and Tennessee. Out of those, only Auburn is in the top 100 as of now.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "Don't confuse association, with something we both really like." ---JB

    BetterOff

  • BetterOff said...

    I think you will find that true in a lot of places. California as a state is different with its size and that it can support many major Universities.

    To the sports angle.

    When you look down the list of other sports, USC is very high in a lot of them. The PAC12 and SEC are closer to each other in the "Olympic" and spring sports than most conferences, along with schools in Texas based on weather to some degree.

    Look at baseball, softball, gymnastics, swimming/diving, golf, track and field/cross country and tennis and you will find schools from both littering the rankings.

    You won't find many more heated rivalries better than Alabama/Georgia Gymnastics. It is hard to imagine gymnastics getting ugly, but does between the two. lol

    When you look at the CWS for baseball, you'll usually find 3 SEC/southern ACC schools, 2 Texas schools, 2 PAC12 schools, and a team like Pepperdine (most beautiful campus in the nation as well) or someone of that nature.

    The same in softball.....3 SEC schools, 3 PAC 12 schools, and 2 Texas schools.

    Could you imagine how big the disparity would be if USC fielded a gymnastics team, a mens soccer team, or softball team? Title IX and limited space on campus.

    signature image

    TrojanWarrior1

  • BetterOff said...

    UNA is Div II. I would bet that most years, San Jose St would crush them.

    Yes, there are very good FCS teams that could beat 30 or 40% of the FBS teams. I agree with that, but no in a big way to UNA. They just happened to have 3 or 4 good FBS transfers, but they still couldn't win the Div II title any of those years.

    sorry, i was thinking of georgia southern, not northern alabama. i bet georgia southern would have beaten san jose st last yr

    What is happiness? The feeling that power is growing, that resistance is overcome.--Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche

    scinsc5

  • Hey, nothing wrong with a Land Grant University, buddy! :P

    *Student at the original Land Grant University*

    Spartrojan

  • TrojanWarrior1 said...

    So God is third on your list?biggrin

    Giving the new guy a little "welcome to the board" initiation with some classic TW humor today, brother ? lol

    I think Better is holding up well on here, but am glad (as John Houseman used to say) he's "eaaarrrnnnn"-ing it.

    USCTraveler

  • BetterOff said...

    Vandy, Florida, Georgia, Texas A&M, Alabama, Auburn, and Missouri are the schools listed by US News in the top 100, in that order.

    The issue with academics is that 6 of the now 14 SEC schools were founded as land grant Universities. They were supposed to only support citizens of the state and were founded as an alternative to the other schools as affordable locations (if tuition reached "X" amount, they would lose their funding) to further one's education in more specialized areas. Since the 60's or so, the trend has changed with the needs of the population and these schools have attempted to become more well-rounded and for that lack of a better wording, better schools. Those are Arkansas, Auburn, LSU, Kentucky, Mississippi St, and Tennessee. Out of those, only Auburn is in the top 100 as of now.

    You could receive an excellent classic education anywhere in the South, I would take the West Coast for technology and research though...and the PAC has 9 of it's member universities that belong to the prestigious Association of American Universities - which is invitation only. The SEC now has three, with the inclusion of Texas A&M. We all know that the USA Today and other rankings are nothing more than beauty contests. I think the AAU inclusion is the most telling.

    Anyone saying the universities are not very good in the South are terribly wrong, and unfair.

    *As to the Olympic tradition...no one comes close to USC. If USC were made a country, it would rank 9th in the world for most Olympic Medals!

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by usctrojan1 on 4/9/2012 at 1:51 PM

    Play

    Visit the University of Southern California

    USC's beautiful and historic University Park campus is a great destination for visitors to Los Angeles. This video offers a preview of what's in store when you come to campus -- classic architecture, park-like grounds, museums, cafés, entertainment and more. Learn more about the University of Southern California: http://www.usc.edu

    http://www.youtube.com/v/eERe0-E4Zpg
    signature image

    "Here are provided seats of meditative joy, where shall rise again the destined reign of Troy." Virgil

    usctrojan1

  • scinsc5 said...

    sorry, i was thinking of georgia southern, not northern alabama. i bet georgia southern would have beaten san jose st last yr

    That is true. App St and Ga Southern have great programs.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "Don't confuse association, with something we both really like." ---JB

    BetterOff